Placeholder Content Image

Pokies? Lotto? Sports betting? Which forms of problem gambling affect Australians the most?

<div class="theconversation-article-body"><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/alex-russell-133860">Alex Russell</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/cquniversity-australia-2140">CQUniversity Australia</a>; <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/matthew-browne-97705">Matthew Browne</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/cquniversity-australia-2140">CQUniversity Australia</a>, and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/matthew-rockloff-569">Matthew Rockloff</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/cquniversity-australia-2140">CQUniversity Australia</a></em></p> <p>Gambling, especially sports and race betting, is a hot political issue at the moment.</p> <p>This is largely due to the recommendations from a 2023 report from a nonpartisan federal government committee, chaired by the late Peta Murphy, called <a href="https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Social_Policy_and_Legal_Affairs/Onlinegamblingimpacts/Report">You Win Some, You Lose More</a>.</p> <p>This report <a href="https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Social_Policy_and_Legal_Affairs/Onlinegamblingimpacts/Report/List_of_recommendations">recommended</a> “the Australian government, with the cooperation of the states and territories, implement a comprehensive ban on all forms of advertising for online gambling”.</p> <p>This has led to lots of debate and controversy.</p> <p>Recently, Peter V’landys, head of the NRL and Racing NSW, <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/nanny-state-nrl-afl-storm-the-field-over-gambling-ads-20240920-p5kc2q.html">claimed</a> lotteries were more harmful than race and sports betting combined, citing independent statistics.</p> <p>Let’s explore the relative harm of different types of gambling and see if this claim holds up.</p> <h2>Australians love a punt</h2> <p>Gambling is widespread in Australia, with <a href="https://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/publications/second-national-study-interactive-gambling-australia-2019-20">more than half of adults</a> engaging in at least one form each year.</p> <p>According to the <a href="https://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/publications/second-national-study-interactive-gambling-australia-2019-20">latest national data</a>, lotteries are the most common type (40% of Australians buy a ticket annually), followed by race betting (17%), pokies (16%), scratchies (15.7%) and sports betting (9.6%).</p> <p>However, the popularity of a gambling form doesn’t necessarily reflect its harm. Different gambling activities have distinct characteristics.</p> <p>Two key factors mean that some gambling forms are more harmful than others: the speed of gambling and bet size.</p> <p>Pokies allow for frequent, small bets, with spins every three seconds. Race and sports betting can involve much larger sums and betting that is relatively fast, but still slower than pokie spins.</p> <p>Sports betting, in particular, is getting faster with in-play betting and <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30386964/">microbetting</a>.</p> <figure><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hI_XFOc4is0?wmode=transparent&amp;start=0" width="440" height="260" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><figcaption><span class="caption">Poker machines, or ‘pokies’ are the biggest single source of gambling losses in Australia.</span></figcaption></figure> <p>Lotteries, on the other hand, are much slower-paced.</p> <p>People typically spend a small amount on tickets and wait for a draw to find out if they’ve won.</p> <p>Although it’s possible to spend a lot on tickets, <a href="https://www.qgso.qld.gov.au/statistics/theme/society/gambling/australian-gambling-statistics">people tend not to</a>, unlike with faster gambling forms.</p> <p>The average spend on pokies among the 16% who play them is around $4,782 per year, compared to an average spend on lotteries of $377 per year. These are averages. Most won’t spend these amounts but some will spend far more, which raises the average amount.</p> <p>V’landys’ claim about lotteries being more harmful than race and sports betting was based on “independent statistics”.</p> <p>He said that of 100 people seeking help from a gambling hotline, 70 had issues with pokies, 15 with lotteries, eight with race betting, four with sports betting, and three with casinos.</p> <p>We were unable to verify these figures – if anyone has the data, we’d love to see the research to assess them.</p> <p>However, we do have publicly available data.</p> <h2>What the data say</h2> <p>The NSW GambleAware website’s <a href="https://www.gambleaware.nsw.gov.au/-/media/ghs-annual-activity-report-2020-21.ashx?rev=e070f9c8bdbf4031816a852f27246c54&amp;hash=C5FC3AA23BE5F2EF69D551A5E2292BA9#:%7E:text=Of%20the%20clients%20receiving%20counselling,36.9%25%20of%20all%20female%20clients.">2020-21</a> report shows that of 2,886 people seeking help, 73.3% identified pokies as their primary form of gambling, while only 13 people (less than 1%) listed lotteries. Race betting accounted for 13.1%, and sports betting for 7.9%.</p> <p>These patterns were consistent with <a href="https://www.gambleaware.nsw.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents">previous years</a>.</p> <p>People who experience problems also usually take part in more than one form of gambling, as the NSW report showed.</p> <p>When these secondary gambling activities were considered, sports betting was cited by 35.5%, race betting by 33.5%, pokies by 19.5%, and lotteries by 13.7%.</p> <h2>What we discovered</h2> <p>The best evidence on gambling problems and harm comes from large-scale prevalence studies, typically commissioned by governments and conducted by independent researchers.</p> <p>These studies offer high-quality insights into how each gambling form contributes to problems.</p> <p>While one prevalence study is great, our team recently combined data from seven national and state-based prevalence studies. This resulted in a very high-quality dataset that we can use to study this question.</p> <p>In <a href="https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2006/12/1/article-p182.xml">our analysis</a>, we used statistical techniques to show how strongly each gambling form is associated with problems.</p> <p>These techniques give us regression coefficients, which are just numbers that tell us how strong the association is. A higher number means a stronger association between that form and gambling problems.</p> <p>The most problematic form was pokies (coefficient = 0.147), followed by casino games (0.136), sports betting (0.068) and race betting (0.038).</p> <p>Lotteries, with a coefficient of 0.001, were the least problematic and were not statistically significant even in our large sample.</p> <p>As you might guess from such a low number, there’s very little relationship between lotteries and gambling problems.</p> <h2>What about prevalence?</h2> <p>Prevalence matters too – while pokies were most strongly associated with problems, the number of people participating in each gambling form is also important.</p> <p>Let’s consider an analogy – a car that gives out a lot of exhaust fumes. That car is harmful, but if virtually no one owns one, then it’s not going to account for much pollution.</p> <p>The same idea applies for gambling forms. If a gambling form is very harmful but very few people do it, it doesn’t account for many problems in the population.</p> <p>It works the other way, too – if there is a very clean type of car that many people drive, they also won’t add up to much pollution.</p> <p>Similarly, if we have gambling forms that have very little association with problems, it won’t add up to many problems in the population, even if lots of people take part.</p> <p>The regression coefficients tell us how problematic each gambling form is. Prevalance tells us how many people do it.</p> <p>When we combine these two bits of information, we can work out the degree of problems in the community that come from each form.</p> <p>When we did this, pokies were responsible for 52-57% of gambling problems in the community.</p> <p>Sports and race betting each contributed 9-11%, with a combined total of around 20%.</p> <p>Lotteries accounted for just 0.1-1% of problems.</p> <p>Even if we include scratchies as part of lotteries, this only adds another 2-5% of problems, still far below sports and race betting.</p> <hr /> <p><iframe id="quxHH" class="tc-infographic-datawrapper" style="border: 0;" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/quxHH/" width="100%" height="400px" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p> <hr /> <h2>The real issue</h2> <p>What’s the takeaway?</p> <p>Lotteries are widely played but are not typically associated with much harm.</p> <p>Sports and race betting, despite having fewer participants, are more harmful due to their faster pace and the potential for large, frequent bets.</p> <p>Lotteries involve slower betting and lower spending, making them much less risky.</p> <p>If we aim to reduce gambling harm in our community, the focus should be on pokies, which are widespread in pubs and clubs <a href="https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2006/12/3/article-p721.xml">outside WA</a>, casino games and race and sports betting.</p> <p>These forms have features that make them far more harmful than slower-paced gambling like lotteries.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/240665/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/alex-russell-133860">Alex Russell</a>, Principal Research Fellow, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/cquniversity-australia-2140">CQUniversity Australia</a>; <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/matthew-browne-97705">Matthew Browne</a>, Senior Lecturer in Statistics, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/cquniversity-australia-2140">CQUniversity Australia</a>, and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/matthew-rockloff-569">Matthew Rockloff</a>, Head, Experimental Gambling Research Lab, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/cquniversity-australia-2140">CQUniversity Australia</a></em></p> <p><em>Image credits: Shutterstock </em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/pokies-lotto-sports-betting-which-forms-of-problem-gambling-affect-australians-the-most-240665">original article</a>.</em></p> </div>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

"Shameful": Betting company slammed for 9-11 themed "Never Forget" promo

<p>DraftKings, a prominent sports betting company in the US, has found itself in hot water on social media this past Monday when it featured a parlay with a 9/11 theme on its mobile app – on the 22nd anniversary of the infamous terror attacks of September 11.</p> <p>Social media users were quick to share screenshots of the DraftKings app late on Sunday night, revealing a parlay named "Never Forget". This special parlay entailed wagering on the New York Mets, New York Yankees, and New York Jets to secure victories on Monday, marking the 22nd anniversary of the tragic terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre.</p> <p>The parlay's description urged users to "Bet these New York teams to win tonight on 9/11," drawing sharp criticism from the online community. Many expressed their disapproval of DraftKings seemingly attempting to profit from the solemn occasion.</p> <p>The parlay remained accessible on the app throughout Sunday night and into Monday morning, further fuelling public discontent over the sports betting company's decision.</p> <p>However, DraftKings eventually removed the parlay on Monday and issued an official apology for its inclusion. Their statement read, "We sincerely apologise for the featured parlay that was shared briefly in commemoration of 9/11. We respect the significance of this day for our country and especially for the families of those who were directly affected."</p> <p>Bret Eagleson, who leads the 9/11 Justice organisation, an advocacy group representing families and first responders, strongly condemned DraftKings' offer as "tone-deaf".</p> <p>Eagleson, whose father, Bruce, tragically lost his life in the World Trade Centre attacks, emphasised to the Associate Press: "It is shameful to use the national tragedy of 9/11 to promote a business. We need accountability, justice, and closure, not self-interest and shameless promotion."</p> <p>DraftKings did not disclose how many individuals placed bets as a result of the 9/11-themed offer, leaving questions unanswered regarding the status of those wagers - whether they remain valid or if they have been cancelled.</p> <p><em>Images: Twitter (X)</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Matildas bet on Albo’s public holiday promise

<p dir="ltr">When Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese first floated the idea of a public holiday for soccer success with the Socceroos and the Men’s World Cup, fans all over were eager for the chance to celebrate. </p> <p dir="ltr">And now, with the Women’s World Cup approaching, all eyes have turned to the Matildas as they strive for victory, with some asking if the public holiday promise extends to the nation’s beloved women’s team, too. </p> <p dir="ltr">And while speaking to <em>The Daily Aus</em>, Albanese had the answer that many were hoping for. However, the promise came with just one major condition - the Matildas had to secure victory.</p> <p dir="ltr">“It’s up to each state and territory to designate public holidays,” he said. “But rest assured - should the Matildas win the World Cup on home soil, I reckon there will be a race by Premiers to declare a public holiday.”</p> <p dir="ltr">And the Matildas were quick to prove themselves up to the challenge, responding to a social media recap on the situation to write “Bet”, along with a handshake emoji. </p> <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CtdjeCDLo7h/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CtdjeCDLo7h/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by The Daily Aus (TDA) (@thedailyaus)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">Passionate supporters - of both soccer and a day off - were thrilled to see it, with many agreeing that the Matildas were in with a real shot at the trophy, and as a result, the nation with the promised holiday. </p> <p dir="ltr">“When he said that he knew there was no way the men’s team would win in a million years,” one user wrote. “The women’s team however have one of the best chances of winning…suck it up boys!”</p> <p dir="ltr">Another agreed, writing that the Matildas “have more of a chance of winning too let’s face it.”</p> <p dir="ltr">“Give us a public holiday!” another chimed in. </p> <p dir="ltr">However, some had their concerns, mostly when it came to the hospitality and small business workers who wouldn’t reap the same rewards from the day. </p> <p dir="ltr">“I want them to win as much as anyone but as a business with 100 clients another public holiday for them to pay to their staff will hurt.....super is rising, awards are rising,” one said. “Give small businesses a break they employ the most people yet are forgotten!!!”</p> <p dir="ltr">“Too many PH already,” another complained. “Full time hospitality workers need a life too.”</p> <p dir="ltr">And for one user, it was a mixed affair, as they shared that “he possibly said it as the men’s team had no chance, but the Matilda’s!!! Yes! Although rather see Melbs Cup dropped in Vic &amp; we pick up a day dedicated to celebrate our Indigenous people &amp; history.”</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Images: Getty</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Surprise favourite heading into Logies weekend

<p dir="ltr">With the Logies just around the corner, debates about who could take home the Gold Logie are heating up, with gambling platforms even weighing in on who it could be.</p> <p dir="ltr">Radio star Hamish Blake has been dubbed a “shoo-in” for the award, but Sportsbet claims Channel 7’s Sonia Kruger could be tipped to nab the award instead, per <em><a href="https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/awards/logies/sportsbet-betting-odds-hint-sonia-kruger-is-hot-on-hamish-blakes-tail-for-gold-logie/news-story/06132b23f0f63ab0760c5d5ab77b766d" target="_blank" rel="noopener">news.com.au</a></em>.</p> <p dir="ltr">Though Blake is still the frontrunner, with betting at $1.80, it’s come as a drop from $1.40 over the past few weeks. Meanwhile, Kruger has gone from $6 to $4, making her the second favourite.</p> <p dir="ltr">Following close behind is <em>MasterChef</em>’s Melissa Leong at $5.50, with <em>Home and Away </em>star Ray Meagher sitting at $10 and <em>I’m a Celeb</em>’s Julie Morris on $11.</p> <p dir="ltr">A victory for Kruger has been a long time coming, with her 20-year career being recognised with a nomination for Most Popular Personality.</p> <p dir="ltr">Speaking to <em><a href="https://tvtonight.com.au/2022/06/2022-gold-logie-nominee-sonia-kruger.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">TV Tonight</a></em> earlier in the week, the 56-year-old said it was “high time” a women nabbed the award, noting that most of the male nominees already have a Gold Logie to their name.</p> <p dir="ltr">“And it’s not a popularity contest but I did host every show on Channel 7 last year and deserve it more than everyone else,” she joked. </p> <p dir="ltr">Sportsbet’s Sean Ormerod echoed the sentiment.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Sonia would be a deserved winner if she takes home the Gold,” he said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“There isn’t much she hasn’t appeared on, <em>Big Brother</em>, <em>Holey Moley</em>, <em>Dancing With The Stars</em>, to name a few, and there’s no doubt her popularity with the voting public.”</p> <p dir="ltr">The 62nd TV Week Logie Awards is set to air on Channel Nine this Sunday at 7pm, with live voting for the Gold Logie open from now until the red carpet telecast.</p> <p dir="ltr">To vote for your favourite from the short-list of nominees, head <a href="https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/awards/oscars/the-will-smith-slap-has-no-place-at-the-oscars-but-absolutely-belongs-at-the-logies/news-story/91b43d68880147bb09c11961703acbb5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-527adac2-7fff-0406-f3a1-fba2c5f87230"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

TV

Placeholder Content Image

Place your bets! Clear favourite for name of Harry and Meghan’s new baby

<p><span>The world is waiting in anticipation for the birth of Meghan and Harry’s second child, especially the name they decide to give their first daughter.</span><br /><br /><span>The Duke and Duchess of Sussex welcomed their son Archie in May 2019, and are waiting for their second child who is due in the coming weeks.</span><br /><br /><span>Bets have already been placed on the name of the little royal, with betting agent Ladbrokes tipping “Philippa” as the top pick.</span><br /><br /><span>The name is a nod to Harry’s grandfather, Prince Philip, who died in April.</span><br /><br /><span>It is paying $4.</span></p> <p><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7841194/meghan-harry-archie-1.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/8534c86b90194ba49f6918fb9ad703d6" /><br /><br /><span>Diana, Harry’s late mother, is closely trailing behind on $6.</span><br /><br /><span>Allegra and Elizabeth are tied third at $11.</span><br /><br /><span>“The support for baby Philippa is showing no signs of slowing down, and we’ve been forced to trim the odds again that it’s the name for Harry and Meghan’s daughter,” Jessica O’Reilly of Ladbrokes told PEOPLE.</span><br /><br /><span>Meghan and Harry shocked bookies when they named their son Archie, as the popular suggestions had been Arthur, Charles and Albert.</span><br /><br /><span>Harry’s cousin Princess Eugenie honoured her late grandfather in her first child’s name, after giving birth in February with husband Jack Brooksbank.</span><br /><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7841195/meghan-harry-archie-2.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/4965ae8759f348b7a2e7dc212f881f20" /><br /><span>They named their son August Philip Hawke Brooksbank.</span><br /><br /><span>Meghan, 39, and Harry, 36, revealed to Oprah Winfrey in their bombshell interview in March that they were expecting a little girl after announcing their pregnancy on Valentine’s Day.</span><br /><br /><span>Harry earlier told the September issue of British Vogue that the couple would only be having two children “maximum”.</span></p> <p><em>Images: Instagram</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Does a face shield protect against COVID-19? We’re not sure — so a mask is probably a safer bet for now

<p>For several weeks, Victorians have been required to <a href="https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-covid-19">wear a face covering</a> when they leave home. And while we now have a clearer path out of lockdown, it’s likely masks will be around for a while.</p> <p>Meanwhile, people in <a href="https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/new-queensland-restrictions-in-force-as-mask-use-encouraged-20200830-p55qoq.html">other states</a> with outbreaks have been encouraged to wear masks, and some people are simply choosing to wear one as a precaution.</p> <p>But some people in the community, instead of opting for a traditional mask, are instead wearing a face shield.</p> <p>This might offer some degree of protection — but it’s probably not as good as a mask in preventing the spread of COVID-19.</p> <p><strong>Get your coronavirus updates from health experts.</strong></p> <p>Get newsletter</p> <p><strong>What is a face shield?</strong></p> <p>A face shield is a film made from plastic or other transparent material designed to be worn like a visor. It’s attached using a band that goes around the top of your head.</p> <p>Think of a visor a welder wears to protect themselves from sparks and injury. Health-care workers use face shields to block bodily fluids from coming into contact with their face, and potentially causing infection.</p> <p>It’s likely many people are choosing face shields during COVID-19 because they’re experiencing discomfort wearing a mask — whether glasses fogging up, irritation around the ears, or just that extra layer.</p> <p>The term “face covering”, as per the <a href="https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-covid-19">Victorian government’s guidelines</a>, is notably vague. It can include a face mask, a face shield, or a scarf or bandana.</p> <p>The <a href="https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-covid-19#what-does-wearing-a-face-covering-mean">department of health</a> does however recommend a mask over a face shield.</p> <p><strong>How effective are face shields?</strong></p> <p>A <a href="https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/5.0022968">letter</a>, published recently in the journal Physics of Fluids, reported on a laboratory experiment where scientists put face shields to the test.</p> <p>They simulated coughing by connecting the head of a mannequin to a fog machine, and then using a pump to expel the vapour through the mannequin’s mouth.</p> <p>They found that while face shields stopped the droplets being propelled forwards, aerosolised droplets — those much smaller in size — lingered at the bottom of the shield and floated around at the sides. They eventually spread approximately 90 centimetres from the mannequins.</p> <p>This is an interesting laboratory experiment, but not conclusive evidence face shields offer less protection than masks in the community.</p> <p>A lack of research on the effectiveness of face shields means it’s not possible to make any strong recommendations for or against their use.</p> <p><strong>Where does this leave us?</strong></p> <p>There’s a lot we still don’t know about this virus and how it spreads.</p> <p>At present, we believe <a href="https://www.health.gov.au/news/health-alerts/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-health-alert/what-you-need-to-know-about-coronavirus-covid-19">the virus is spread</a> generally through close contact with an infectious person, contact with the droplets emitted when they sneeze or cough, or contact with surfaces these droplets have contaminated.</p> <p>To establish an infection the virus enters your body through portals of entry: the mouth, nose and eyes.</p> <p>Wearing a mask is intended to protect others if you have the infection, by blocking the droplets coming out of your mouth and nose. We call this source control. To a degree — though we have <a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions">less evidence</a> on this front — it’s also likely to protect you, the wearer, by providing a physical barrier to your portals of entry.</p> <p>A face shield may offer an advantage in that it provides a physical barrier over all your portals of entry — your eyes as well as your mouth and nose. Shields may also reduce the frequency of the wearer touching their face, and have the added benefit of allowing the person’s face to be seen (if they’re not wearing a mask as well).</p> <p>However, as they’re not tight fitting, aerosols may still enter and exit around the outside of a face shield, where it’s not fitted in the same way a mask is. And we’re continuing to accumulate evidence about the possible role of aerosolised transmission in the spread of COVID-19, which the <a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions">World Health Organisation</a> is closely monitoring.</p> <p><strong>Correct use is important too</strong></p> <p>Whatever face covering you choose, you must use it properly, and it must fit correctly.</p> <p>Having masks slung under the chin, hanging off one ear, or your nose poking out over the top of the mask will make them markedly less effective. And of course frequently touching and re-adjusting the mask means we’re possibly contaminating our hands too.</p> <p>If you don’t intend to wear a mask properly or you’re unable to, then a face shield is a better option. You can also wear mask and a face shield together, should you wish to.</p> <p>Like masks, there are a variety of face shields available, varying in quality and size. The <a href="https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-covid-19#what-does-wearing-a-face-covering-mean">department of health advise</a> if you wear a face shield it should cover “the wearer’s forehead to below the chin area and wrapping around the sides of the wearer’s face”.</p> <p>You should not share a face shield. If they’re labelled disposable, don’t reuse them. And if they are reusable you need to clean them regularly following the manufacturer’s instructions.</p> <p><strong>The upshot</strong></p> <p>Masks worn correctly are the best option. When wearing a mask is not possible, then a face shield is better than nothing. Neither will work well if not used properly, and importantly, they don’t replace physical distancing and hand hygiene.</p> <p><em>Written by Phillip Russo and Brett Mitchell. Republished with permission of <a href="https://theconversation.com/does-a-face-shield-protect-against-covid-19-were-not-sure-so-a-mask-is-probably-a-safer-bet-for-now-145547">The Conversation.</a> </em></p>

Beauty & Style

Placeholder Content Image

“Dedicate this to dad”: A group of mates lucky $500,000 Melbourne Cup win

<p>A group of mates will be counting their blessings after winning $500,000 by backing Vow and declaring months ago they would be victorious in the Melbourne Cup. </p> <p>The incredible moment they realised they had won an eye watering amount was recorded on video.</p> <p>39-year-old Alex Xerri made a number of bets starting from June when Vow and Declare were at huge odds. Thankfully this bet paid off in the end, and won him $320,000 on Tuesday, as well as an extra $200,000 by his friends who followed his hot tip. </p> <p>The video was shot by his friend Jimmy Hoyne, and showed the group’s excitement when the gelding surged home and snatched up the Melbourne Cup. </p> <p>The moment felt bittersweet for Mr Xerri who’s father Paul, 81, passed away a month ago, before he had the chance to collect $40,000 from bets he also made on the winning horse. </p> <p>“It was difficult, I was really sad that he never got to watch the Cup and share in the excitement and happiness,” he told Daily Mail Australia.</p> <p>“He always backed my judgement and I know he's proud of me. It was a very touching and emotional moment.</p> <p>“I have to dedicate this to dad.”</p> <p><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FJimmyHoyne%2Fvideos%2F2536730216403887%2F&amp;show_text=0&amp;width=267" width="267" height="476" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe></p> <p> Xerri said he and his dad hopefully placed their first bets on June 8 after watching Vow and Declare come second in the Queensland Derby.</p> <p>Just two weeks later, the racehorse won the Tattersall's Cup, however they then had to wait months to see it would compete again at the Turnbull Stakes on October 5.</p> <p>However, in a turn of tragic events, Paul suddenly died from an unexpected heart attack the morning of the race, a month before the Melbourne Cup would commence. </p> <p>Xerri said a eulogy delivered at his funeral expressed how excited Paul was to put his bets to the ultimate test. </p> <p>“The speech said how he was really excited about a horse that will run in the Melbourne Cup, and last few months of his life that's what he was really looking for,” he said.</p> <p>The winning son said his father would continue to place bets on the horses despite being told to stop. </p> <p>“We went through his wallet and he had all his bet slips printed and A4 sheet of paper,” he explained.</p> <p>“He believed it would happen, he'd never won that sort of money in his life and we were talking about what we would do if it won.” </p> <p>Mr Xerri said he became convinced Vow and Declare could win the Melbourne Cup after it won an 1,800m race on Oaks Day in 2018. </p> <p>Paul listened to the advice of renowned horse trainer Danny O'Brien, who talked up his horse's abilities.</p> <p>“He said it was an elite staying prospect and everything it was doing suggested it could run the Cup's distance,” he recalled.</p> <p>“I thought from then it was a potential Melbourne Cup champion.”</p> <p>Xerri placed more bets in following months after initially placing $100 for the horses to win at 201/1 and $900 to place at 51/1 at the Queensland Derby. </p> <p>He placed more bets in following months and convinced 25 friends to get on board and place their own bets on the same horses. </p> <p>The gamble earned him about $320,000 in winnings by Tuesday’s race, and his friends $200,000 between them. </p> <p>Mr Hoyne's video showed the five friends getting progressively more excited as Vow and Declare entered the final straight on the tail of the leader and gradually wore down the margin.</p> <p>When Vow and Declare crossed the line first, the room erupted. </p> <p>“I have never felt a rush like that in my life... words cannot explain,” the friend who filmed the scene said.</p> <p>“Such a big day for the family man been riding this horse for over a year and to see it come true - unbelievable.”</p> <p>Xerri said there was a lot of anticipation leading up to the race as he knew he and others had cash riding on the result. </p> <p>“I was nervous, my legs were jelly. I'd told so many for so long and they'd put money on it just because I said to,” he said.</p>

Caring

Placeholder Content Image

Racing figure pleads guilty to $17.5m betting fraud

<p>Melbourne racing identity Bill Vlahos has admitted to defrauding punters of $17.5 million in a complex con.</p> <p>On Monday, the 54-year-old pleaded guilty to two charges of dishonestly obtaining a financial advantage by pocketing $17,520,225 paid by his betting club investors between 2008 and 2013.</p> <p>According to court documents, 68 people who were caught up in the scam believed Vlahos was betting their money on thoroughbred horses on their behalf.</p> <p>However, the bets were either never placed or only a fraction of the money was laid.</p> <p>“The betting numbers attached to the betting sheets were not true or accurate and the betting and results sheets contained false information,” the court documents stated.</p> <p>In <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-30/racing-identity-bill-vlahos-pleads-guilty-to-defrauding-clients/11559556" target="_blank">one case</a> from May 2008, Vlahos claimed to have put $219,000 on a horse called Gorky Park and won $657,000, when he had in fact placed only $2,500 and gained $9,000 in return.</p> <p>The documents also described The Edge, which Vlahos opened in 2002/2003, as a “Ponzi scheme” used to “service the unrelated personal expenditure” of Vlahos and his other businesses.</p> <p>The syndicate folded in 2013 after gamblers looked to cash out. Vlahos filed for bankruptcy in the same year.</p> <p>While Vlahos initially faced 374 charges for deceiving up to 1,500 victims out of $128 million, a <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/bail-for-bill-vlahos-after-he-admits-17-5m-rip-off-but-jail-looms-20190930-p52w94.html" target="_blank">deal</a> was reached between his lawyers and prosecutors for him to plead guilty to only two charges.</p> <p>Judge Douglass Trapnell said Vlahos’ imprisonment was “inevitable” due to the serious nature of his offences.</p> <p>Vlahos’ bail was extended. He is expected to appear before court on February 4 for a pre-sentence hearing.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

13 books we bet you never knew were banned

<p><strong>The Dictionary</strong></p> <p>Wait … what? Some students working on their spelling might have been out of luck when the teacher asked them to “look it up”. In 1987, the Anchorage School Board in Alaska <span><a href="https://theweek.com/articles/459795/17-americas-most-surprising-banned-books">banned</a></span> the American Heritage Dictionary because it had “objectionable” entries, like the slang definitions for “balls,” “knocker” and “bed.” A California elementary school <span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/29/the-11-most-surprising-ba_n_515381.html?slideshow=true#gallery/5635/0">banned</a></span> Merriam Webster from its shelves because the definition of oral sex was “not age appropriate”.</p> <p><strong>The Lorax</strong></p> <p>Dr. Seuss may have endeared the hearts of millions, but <em>The Lorax</em>, about the perils of deforestation, didn’t sit well with California loggers. One community <span><a href="https://www.nypl.org/blog/2013/09/24/banned-books-week-green-eggs-and-ham">banned</a></span> the book for its negative portrayal of the industry. (By the way, you've been saying "Dr. Seuss" wrong.) </p> <p><strong>Yertle the Turtle</strong></p> <p>Anti-deforestation wasn’t Dr. Seuss’s only political message to make schools squirm. One Canadian school announced <em>Yertle the Turtle</em> one of its <span><a href="https://www.nypl.org/blog/2013/09/24/banned-books-week-green-eggs-and-ham">banned books</a></span> in 2012 because of this line: "I know up on top you are seeing great sights, but down here at the bottom, we too should have rights." Apparently, that line was too partisan for a school that had banned political messages.</p> <p><strong>James and the Giant Peach</strong></p> <p>No matter how you feel about human-sized bugs, Roald Dahl’s <em>James and the Giant Peach</em> seems innocent enough at first glance. Some schools have challenged it for language, and tobacco and alcohol references. But perhaps the oddest? In 1999, one small Wisconsin town officially made it one of its banned books after <span><a href="http://orgs.utulsa.edu/spcol/?p=3246">claiming</a></span> a scene when the spider licks her lips could be “taken in two ways, including sexual”. Can’t say that would have been our first thought.</p> <p><strong>Where the Wild Things Are</strong></p> <p>It was tough enough for author Maurice Sendak to get his borderline dark and scary children’s book published. When it finally did hit the shelves, it got in even more trouble. <em>Where the Wild Things Are</em> is now a fun classic, but it was initially <span><a href="https://theweek.com/articles/459795/17-americas-most-surprising-banned-books">banned</a></span> because little Max’s punishment was starvation– well, lack of supper – and the story had supernatural themes.</p> <p><strong>Where the Sidewalk Ends</strong></p> <p>You might want to reread Shel Silverstein’s collection of poems, <em>Where the Sidewalk Ends</em> – you may have missed something in its quirky, funny and touching verses. <span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/giving-tree-50-sadder-remembered">According to some schools</a></span>, the book actually promotes everything from drug use and suicide to ignoring parents and telling lies. Yikes.</p> <p><strong>Harriet the Spy</strong></p> <p>Who knew a child misfit could create such a stir? Sure, kids loved Harriet for her strong will and rebelliousness, but critics <span><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87779452">argued</a></span> the “spy” was less of a good-girl Nancy Drew and more of a mean-spirited gossip. Some schools banned Louise Fitzhugh’s <em>Harriet the Spy</em> to keep students from the bad influence.</p> <p><strong>The Giving Tree</strong></p> <p>To some, this was Shel Silverstein’s sweet story about unconditional love. But to one bitter Colorado librarian who <span><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1989-09-26/entertainment/ca-340_1_fullerton-college">took it off the shelves</a></span>, <em>The Giving Tree</em> was just plain “sexist”.</p> <p><strong>Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See?</strong></p> <p>Might as well stop trying to wrack your brain for what in the world could have been grounds to take <em>Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See?</em> out of schools. It was all an awkward mistake. Eric Carle might be a famous children’s illustrator, but the Texas State Board of Education <span><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/richard-adams-blog/2010/jan/28/brown-bear-banned-texas">wouldn’t approve</a></span> the storybook after recognising writer Bill Martin Jr.’s name from another book: <em>Ethical Marxism</em>. There was just one problem – the political Bill Martin was not the same Bill Martin Jr. as had written the children’s book. Next time, maybe the school board should do its homework.</p> <p><strong>The Diary of a Young Girl</strong></p> <p>No, Anne Frank’s diary hasn’t been removed from libraries because of the terror of hiding from Nazis. Schools have <span><a href="http://www.npr.org/2014/09/27/351811082/banned-books-remind-us-of-the-power-of-the-written-word">deemed</a></span> some of the 14-year-old’s descriptions of her anatomy as “pornographic”. More cringe-worthy? One Alabama textbook committee asked for it to be <span><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/28/AR2010012804001.html">banned</a></span> because it was “a real downer”. </p> <p><strong>Charlotte’s Web</strong></p> <p>The unlikely friendship between a pig and spider sparked a much bigger controversy among Kansas parents in 1952. They had Charlotte's Web <span><a href="https://theweek.com/articles/459795/17-americas-most-surprising-banned-books">banned</a></span> because talking animals went against their religious beliefs, arguing humans are "the only creatures that can communicate vocally. Showing lower life forms with human abilities is sacrilegious and disrespectful to God”. We wonder what they’d think about the <em>Cat in the Hat</em> and Mickey Mouse and the three little bears and ...</p> <p><strong>The Grapes of Wrath</strong></p> <p>John Steinbeck’s work of fiction was based on the reality of the Dust Bowl that left migrants homeless and in search of work. In Kern County, California, where the protagonists land, the real-life county board of supervisors didn’t appreciate the author’s portrayal of how locals didn’t help migrants. A 1939 vote <span><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95190615">removed</a></span> <em>The Grapes of Wrath</em> from the area’s schools and libraries.</p> <p><strong>To Kill a Mockingbird</strong></p> <p>Despite being so beloved, Harper Lee’s novel is still the <span><a href="http://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/classics">fourth most-challenged or banned</a></span> classic book. Advocates of banning it argue its issues with racism and sexuality aren’t suitable for young readers.</p> <p><em>Written by Marissa Laliberte. This article first appeared in <span><a href="http://www.readersdigest.com.au/true-stories-lifestyle/thought-provoking/13-books-we-bet-you-never-knew-were-banned?items_per_page=All">Reader’s Digest</a></span>. For more of what you love from the world’s best-loved magazine, <span><a href="http://readersdigest.innovations.com.au/c/readersdigestsubscribe?utm_source=readersdigest&amp;utm_campaign=RDSUB&amp;utm_medium=display&amp;keycode=WRA85S">here’s our best subscription offer</a></span>.</em></p> <p><img style="width: 100px !important; height: 100px !important;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7820640/1.png" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/f30947086c8e47b89cb076eb5bb9b3e2" /></p>

Books

Placeholder Content Image

The royal baby name everyone is betting on

<p>It's not long now until the royal baby arrives and as the delivery draws closer, bookies are taking bets on the name and gender.</p> <p>Royal fans were previously speculating that Prince William and Kate were expecting a girl, however, <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/lifestyle/family-pets/2018/04/prince-william-may-have-just-accidentally-revealed-the-sex-of-baby-number-3/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">a recent comment made by Prince William</span></strong></a> has convinced many that their new baby is a boy.</p> <p>After Aston villa player Jack Grealish scored a goal during a football match, William said that the baby should be named after the star athlete, reported <a href="https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/prince-william-drops-huge-hint-12345342" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>The Mirror.</strong></em></span></a></p> <p>“I’m going to insist the baby is called Jack,” before adding “ ... or Jackie”, the duke reportedly said.</p> <p>According to <em>The Sun,</em> traditionally royal parents don’t find out the gender of the baby until it’s born. However, Princess Diana reportedly knew that she was having boys.</p> <p>On Sportsbet.com.au, bets on the baby being a boy start a $1.90 and $2 for a girl.</p> <p>Betting website William Hill have Mary (3/1) and Alice (6/1) listed as the two most likely girl names.</p> <p>Previous frontrunners Elizabeth (12/1) and Victoria (8/1) have fallen down the list.</p> <p>Popular bookmaker Coral also has Alice and Mary in the lead, both at 5/1.</p> <p>Coral’s Jonah Hill told <em>The Express </em>that interest in the baby name is increasing as the due date grows closer.</p> <p>“At the moment, many punters are convinced it is going to be a girl and it will be named Mary,” he said</p> <p>If the baby is a boy, the names believed to be picked are Albert, Arthur, Fred or Frederick, all at 12/1.</p> <p>Coral also has Albert and Arthur at 12/1.</p> <p>“The girls’ names have been dominant at the head of the betting leading to speculation that people might know that a girl is on the way however with the due date surely just a matter of weeks away, the boys’ names are starting to attract a bit of cash,” said William Hill spokesman Joe Crilly.</p> <p>“I imagine that Kate would push back on baby number three being named after a footballer though.”</p> <p>James, Alexandria, Grace, Philip, Alexander, Henry, Olivia and Catherine, are also names that are believed to be in the running.</p> <p>What name do you think Prince William and Kate will choose? </p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Bet limits for poker machines to be trialled in Melbourne

<p>To tackle Victoria’s growing addiction to gambling, betting limits on poker machines will be trialled in Melbourne this month. It’s the first trial of its kind and will involved</p> <p>100 volunteer gamblers in 14 venues around Melbourne.</p> <p>The launch is a key part of a proposed multimillion-dollar scheme, as it will help sort out any hiccups with the software before it is rolled out statewide later in the year.</p> <p>The experts however are sceptical that it will be a success.</p> <p>Similar trials have failed in other states, according to Monash University Senior lecturer Dr Charles Livingstone. He suggests that the system should be made mandatory for every player.</p> <p>“The problem is the precommitment scheme being rolled out is voluntary, which means you can use the machines without using the system,’’ he said.</p> <p>“There have been trials in Australia before, in Queensland and South Australia, which showed the take up rates are very small. It is a step forward but as a system that minimises harm it is at the bottom end of the scale.’’</p> <p>The solution to reducing the amount of money being put into poker machines, according to Dr Livingstone, is to introduce a maximum $1 bet.</p> <p>Victorians placed $1.3 billion into the pokies from July to December 2014, with over 40 per cent of revenue coming from users considered to have a gambling problem.</p> <p>While the trial was allocated $2 million in the 2015-16 budget it is believed that the precommitment program has already cost tens of millions of dollars to develop so far.</p> <p>The program would see gamblers given a card to use on the poker machines that would let them set limits, change the thresholds and track their betting habits.</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Related links:</strong></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="/news/news/2015/06/four-seniors-at-bonnaroo/">What happens when a group of 70-something-year-olds go to a music festival?</a></strong></em></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="/news/news/2015/06/music-causes-car-accidents/">Listening to music while driving linked to car accidents</a></strong></em></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="/news/news/2015/06/stationmaster-cat-mourned-by-thousands/">Japanese stationmaster cat mourned by thousands</a></strong></em></span></p>

News

Our Partners