Placeholder Content Image

Man beats mobile phone driving charge in “unusual” ruling

<p dir="ltr">A Queensland man has had his charge of using a mobile phone successfully overturned in court - but the ruling could see state legislation changed to close any existing “loophole” that exists.</p> <p dir="ltr">Konrad Gordon Gallaher appeared in the Southport Magistrates Court last week to fight the charge from the transport department after he was photographed holding an electronic device while driving by traffic cameras.</p> <p dir="ltr">Mr Gallaher provided evidence that he was actually handling an Apple iPod, highlighting the fact that his mobile phone could be seen mounted on the dashboard in the photo.</p> <p dir="ltr">Showing the device in question to the court, he said it had “no phone functionality”.</p> <p dir="ltr">His evidence was accepted by magistrate Dzenita Balic, who also clarified that it was up to the prosecution to prove beyond unreasonable doubt that Mr Gallaher was using a mobile phone.</p> <p dir="ltr">While she found that the device in question was actually an iPhone, Mr Gallaher had testified that the device didn’t have a SIM card and was unable to make calls.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I could not find, and I do not, that he was dishonest in his description of the device as a portable music player,” she said in <a href="https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2022/QMC22-002.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">her verdict</a> delivered on Friday.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Although to my mind he is clearly wrong about the device being an iPod, his other assertions as to the limited musical functionality of the device remained unchallenged.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I should add that to me, the use of this device by Mr Gallaher was just as dangerous as the use of a mobile phone.</p> <p dir="ltr">“(But) a mobile phone therefore must take on its natural meaning. It is a device capable of communication.</p> <p dir="ltr">“My view is that, at the time of the driving, I cannot be satisfied, considering the evidence by Mr Gallaher, which I have now discussed from different angles, that this was indeed a mobile phone at the relevant time.”</p> <p dir="ltr">In Queensland, rules about driver distractions are under the <em>Transport Operations (Road Use Management-Road Rules) Regulation 2009</em>, which states that it’s an offence for a person to hold a phone or rest it on any part of their body while the car is moving or stationary but not parked outside of limited circumstances, such as using it to pay in a drive-through or to provide their digital documents to police.</p> <p dir="ltr">These laws specifically refer to mobile phones rather than any kind of electronic device.</p> <p dir="ltr">Queensland Transport Minister Mark Bailey told <em><a href="https://7news.com.au/news/qld/queensland-man-beats-mobile-phone-driving-charge-in-ruling-set-to-have-major-implications-c-8841473" target="_blank" rel="noopener">7News</a></em> that Balic’s ruling was “unusual” and that he would be seeking advice on the matter.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Clearly the driver was still distracted, which is the intent of the legislation,” he said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“So I’ll be getting advice on this matter.</p> <p dir="ltr">“If there is any loophole that exists, we’ll be seeking to close it.”</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-6c31715d-7fff-53a3-a4d7-80f6fb053f9c"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

The vaccine loophole that could see Novak defend his title

<p>Novak Djokovic could be allowed to defend his winning title at the French Open under new Covid-19 restrictions, even if he is not vaccinated. </p> <p>After Djokovic's high-profile deportation from Australia when he didn't meet the country's vaccine rules, his future at the French Open was also thrown into jeopardy. </p> <p>It initially appeared that the Serbian tennis star would not be welcomed at <span>Roland-Garros under a new law that intended to ban unvaccinated people from stadiums, bars, restaurants and other public places. </span></p> <p><span>French Sports Minister Roxana Maracineanu previously said that as soon as the law was passed, France's vaccine pass would be compulsory "for all spectators, practitioners, French or foreign professionals" to enter stadiums, theatres or exhibition centres. </span></p> <p><span>However, thanks to a loophole in the vaccine pass, Novak could be allowed to still </span>compete.</p> <p>The vaccine pass is not limited to Covid-19 vaccinations, as anyone who has tested positive to Covid within the last six months is exempt from having to display the pass. </p> <p>This rule suggests Djokovic could still compete in the French Open in May and June, due to the fact that he tested positive in mid-December 2021. </p> <p>The French sports ministry and French Open organisers have said its too early to comment on Djokovic's future at the event, saying restrictions may change between now and May depending on the virus situation. </p> <p>Novak has yet to make a comment on the situation, with his team claiming he will not give any public statements until the end of the Australian Open on January 30th. </p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

University students jailed after finding KFC loophole

<p>A group of Chinese university students have been sentenced to up to two and a half years in jail after they found a loophole to receive AUD $40,000 worth of KFC.</p> <p>The university students from east China’s Jiangsu Province scammed KFC through their mobile apps,<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202105/1223171.shtml" target="_blank">the<span> </span><em>Global Times</em><span> </span>reports.</a></p> <p>The group obtained free KFC meals and made profits by reselling it.</p> <p>In total, the fast food giant had economic losses equating to 200,000 yuan ($40,000).</p> <p>One student discovered that through his WeChat account, he could get meals and coupons without fronting up the money.</p> <p>The young person would sell coupons as well as meals to make a profit.</p> <p>He would also order meals for himself.</p> <p>In the time period between April and October 2018, his dealings led for the company to lose over 58,000 yuan ($11,000).</p> <p>The other students that were part of the elaborate scam had losses that ranged from 8,900 yuan ($1700) to 47,000 yuan ($9400) each.</p> <p>The court ruled the main instigator, whose last name is Xu, would be given a two-and-a-half-year jail sentence, along with a 6000 yuan ($1200) fine.</p> <p>They were charged for “crimes of fraud and imparting criminal methods”.</p> <p>The other four scammers were sentenced from 15 months to two years in jail.</p> <p>They were also fined between 1000 yuan ($200) and 4000 yuan ($800).</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

The travel bubble loophole that could land you in jail

<p>Travellers who are considering using the newly-opened travel bubble to New Zealand to head to other countries risk receiving massive fines and even jail time.</p> <p dir="ltr">With quarantine-free flights now available between New Zealand and Australia, news of a ‘loophole’ appeared that could enable Australian travellers to enter other international destinations.</p> <p dir="ltr">Current COVID restrictions mean that Australians have been banned from leaving the country unless they have an exemption.</p> <p dir="ltr">But, since Aussies can now travel to New Zealand, our kiwi neighbour could act as a stepping stone to other foreign countries.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CN1YbWXDwFT/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="13"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CN1YbWXDwFT/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by New Zealand (@purenewzealand)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">To prevent unnecessary travel, Health Minister Greg Hunt signed off on a new amendment to the Australian Government’s<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2021L00456?fbclid=IwAR1laL3vGPRQAr_JErYR1Uf59sHszZ15SjuCjd0YIN-HCyoR628MXhSOhyk" target="_blank">Biosecurity Legislation (Human Coronavirus with Pandemic Potential)</a>, which comes into effect on Monday.</p> <p dir="ltr">The change will see Australian citizens and residents penalised if they travel to a foreign country beyond New Zealand unless they have an exemption to travel for a compassionate reason, such as the death or serious illness of a close family member, or they require medical treatment that isn’t reasonably available in Australia or New Zealand.</p> <p dir="ltr">According to the document, those who break the rules “may contravene a civil penalty provision’ set out in section 46 of the Biosecurity Act.</p> <p dir="ltr">The minimum penalty for failing to comply with entry and exit requirements in the Biosecurity Act starts at $6300.</p> <p dir="ltr">But, the penalty listed on the Australian Parliament website is much harsher, with people who intentionally disobey the rules facing up to five years’ jail time and a $63,000 fine.</p> <p dir="ltr">Despite still being in its early days, a new community COVID case in Auckland has Australian health authorities concerned that the trans-Tasman bubble could pop.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CGYrBcPj2eH/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="13"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CGYrBcPj2eH/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by Aussiepomm (@aussiepomm)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">New Zealand’s Ministry of Health announced the case just a day after the quarantine requirements were lifted for those travelling between Australia and New Zealand.</p> <p dir="ltr">The case is believed to have contracted the virus from a passenger who arrived on an international flight from a ‘red zone’ (high risk) country.</p> <p dir="ltr">Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the new case shouldn’t impact the trans-Tasman travel arrangements.</p> <p dir="ltr">‘These are the kind of scenarios where we would anticipate movement continuing,’ she said.</p> <p dir="ltr">‘Our Minister of Health has kept in touch with his counterpart. They’re directly communicating and so are our officials.’</p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Loophole in JobKeeper payments worries tax experts

<p><span>A large loophole has been found in the assessment process for the JobKeeper payment that tax experts worry could be exploited by hundreds of thousands of Aussies.</span><br /><br /><span>In order to receive the full $1,200 per fortnight in wage support, sole traders will need to show the Tax Office they were working more than 20 hours per week in the reference period.</span><br /><br /><span>However the reference period is between the two fortnightly pay periods prior to either March 1, 2020 or July 1, 2020 - whichever had the higher hours worked.</span><br /><br /><span>The activity test given to sole traders simply means they need to be "actively engaged in the business" for 20 hours a week to receive the full JobKeeper rate.</span><br /><br /><span>However Chartered Accountants tax lead Michael Croker told <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-08/jobkeeper-loophole-will-tempt-sole-traders-into-rorts/12638334" target="_blank"><em>ABC news</em></a> that "What you're pointing out is a tempting opportunity.” .</span><br /><br /><span>Chartered Accountants represents 120,000 number crunchers around the country.</span><br /><br /><span>The profession is already trying to raise the fact it will be difficult for small businesses and sole traders to rally up their hours of work each fortnight.</span><br /><br /><span>"The Treasurer announced that for sole traders that they needed to be 'actively engaged in the business' for 20 hours or more per week to get the higher rate," Mr Croker explained.</span><br /><br /><span>He noted that they would otherwise only be eligible for the part-time rate of $750.</span><br /><br /><span>"Now, you could be washing the dishes at night and thinking about your business at the same time — that's a very loose test."</span><br /><br /><span>Mr Crocker says many Australians across the nation will be tempted to rort the system, adding that the JobKeeper system requires a degree of honesty for those applying.</span><br /><br /><span>"What we expect to see is common sense prevail around this," he said. .</span><br /><br /><span>"I think to a degree we shouldn't make a mountain out of a molehill here.</span><br /><br /><span>"We're about the economy and jobs, not about compliance and regulation."</span><br /><br /><span>ATO has announced in a statement they have a JobKeeper integrity team whose sole purpose is to make sure JobKeeper is going to those who genuinely need it.</span><br /><br /><span>"We use a range of sophisticated data and behavioural models to identify applications which we will need to review before we make a payment," an ATO spokesperson said in a statement.</span><br /><br /><span>"We will also continue to review applications after payment cycles to identify any risks and issues which cause us concern."</span></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Disturbing quarantine loophole confirmed

<p>Victoria Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton has revealed there is a loophole which allows Victorians who test positive for COVID-19 to leave their home while they are supposed to be in isolation. </p> <p>Sutton addressed the media on Tuesday to speak about the 384 new cases that occurred over night and the six deaths — four of which were linked to aged care.</p> <p>One reporter asked the CHO one question however that uncovered a loophole that permits those with COVID-19 to leave their home. </p> <p>“Those in quarantine because they have tested positive, are they allowed to leave for exercise?” she asked.</p> <p>“They are, otherwise it is detention and we do not have detention for cases in Victoria,” Professor Sutton confirmed. </p> <p>“They are entitled to exercise within their home and their garden, ideally.”</p> <p>The reporter commented that the direction “would appear to go against what we have been hearing for months about what people should be doing in quarantine”.</p> <p>Prof Sutton rebutted and said that the advice had not changed and related only to people who have limited space in their home to exercise.</p> <p>“People who have no garden and have no other option … have a right to exercise,” he said.</p> <p>“So the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities is clear that if you are not giving people an option to exercise then you are effectively putting them in prison and that is not something that can be done for a case of coronavirus or for anyone else for that matter.”</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

The coronavirus super loophole you should know

<p>How would you feel if you were having a Zoom meeting with your accountant and they asked “how would you like to save more than $5,000 in income tax over the next six months?”</p> <p>While probably a bit sceptical (did I hear right? Maybe this technology is faulty? What’s the catch? Surely this is too good to be true?) you might be intrigued. You might even turn up the volume to make sure you hear the next bit.</p> <p>What about if they followed up with, “It’s completely legal. The Australian government will be picking up the tab as part of the stimulus packages! Plus, you can do it mostly risk-free. But you do have to rearrange your financial affairs a bit, and deal with some bureaucratic hurdles.”</p> <p>What the accountant would be referring to is a generous incentive that is on offer now over the next six months.</p> <p>It is linked to the decision to temporarily allow the <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/Fact_sheet-Early_Access_to_Super_1.pdf">early release</a> of A$10,000 in super this financial year and $10,000 the next.</p> <p>When parliament approved the <a href="https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r6521_aspassed/toc_pdf/20044b01.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf">Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus Bill 2020</a> last week, they put no new restrictions on how people could contribute into super.</p> <p>This means that it’s possible to voluntarily contribute $10,000 of your pre-tax income into super over the next three months, and also apply to withdraw a $10,000 lump sum from super tax-free at some point before June 30.</p> <p>You still end up with $10,000 in your pocket. But if you contribute through a salary sacrifice arrangement with your employer and stay within the <a href="https://moneysmart.gov.au/grow-your-super/super-contributions">concessional contributions limits</a>, your voluntary contributions will be taxed at 15% rather than your marginal personal tax rate.</p> <p>When you pull out the funds from super, the withdrawal is tax free. And, you will be able to do the same thing again between July 1 and late September.</p> <p>In a working paper released by the ANU’s Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, we described these kinds of situations – where people assume a different legal form in order to receive a lower marginal tax rate – as “<a href="https://taxpolicy.crawford.anu.edu.au/publication/ttpi-working-papers/16280/australian-tax-planning-playbook-volume-1">tax arbitrage</a>”. They are completely legal, and widespread.</p> <p>Like other tax arbitrage opportunities, there are sizeable tax savings available from the pursuing of the super equivalent of the <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=hokey+pokey&amp;rlz=1C1CHBF_en-GBAU863AU863&amp;oq=hokey+pokey&amp;aqs=chrome..69i57j46l2j0l5.1489j0j4&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8">Hokey Pokey</a>.</p> <p>This chart illustrates the sums involved.</p> <hr /> <p><strong>Potential tax saving in one specific scenario associated with salary sacrificing up to $10,000 into super and withdrawing it in the same financial year</strong></p> <p><a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/324470/original/file-20200401-66169-10a2vw8.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/324470/original/file-20200401-66169-10a2vw8.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="" /></a> <span class="caption">Personal income tax calculations include the Low Income Tax Offset, Low and Middle Income Tax Offset and the Medicare Levy.</span></p> <hr /> <p>It applies to a very specific scenario: a working age individual who is on 9.5% compulsory super contributions, has an annual salary below $158,000, has made no previous voluntary contributions to super in 2019-20, and who elects to make a “simultaneous” (within 2019-20) pre-tax contribution to and withdrawal of the maximum possible $10,000 from super over the next three months.</p> <p>It suggests that, as long as an individual in this situation has an annual income of approximately $30,000 or more, there is a prospective tax saving from rearranging his or her financial affairs over the next three months.</p> <p>The tax savings can be risk-free, if that’s what you want. If you were worried about the stock market falling further and taking away your contributions to super with it, you can direct your super fund to hold all new contributions purely as cash.</p> <p>In all, its not a bad return for three (or six) month’s efforts – especially as it results purely from a change in legal fiction rather than any change in underlying economic activity.</p> <p><strong>Who can do it?</strong></p> <p>As always with these kinds of arrangements, the devil is in the detail, but there is a lot we already know.</p> <p>First, the arrangements are targeted at those who have been adversely impacted by the coronavirus. On or after January 1, 2020 working hours (or turnover for sole traders) have to have been fallen by at least 20%.</p> <p>And it benefits those willing to embrace the bureaucratic hurdles (or outsource the embracing to their accountant). Consistent with Australia’s self-assessment tax system, the onus is on the applicant to certify that they qualify. The Tax Office will then make a determination that the funds be released by the super fund.</p> <p>There appears to a fair bit of discretion left to the ATO as to what impacts from coronavirus will be considered sufficient.</p> <p>One thing is that isn’t clear is what the base period for comparison is, although some <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/Fact_sheet-Early_Access_to_Super_1.pdf">examples</a> provided by treasury compare outcomes over a month in 2020 against the average over the six months at the end of 2019.</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/324479/original/file-20200401-66109-dm30kr.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/324479/original/file-20200401-66109-dm30kr.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="" /></a> <span class="caption"></span> <span class="attribution"><a href="https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/Fact_sheet-Early_Access_to_Super_1.pdf" class="source">Early access to super fact sheet, Commonwealth Treasury, March 2020</a></span></p> <p>It seems quite straightforward if your workplace has cut back your hours or the business you own has had its trade (say) halved, but it is less clear cut if you have voluntarily scaled back your hours because of childcare or if you have returned from working overseas because of the virus.</p> <p>The second key condition is you need to be fortunate enough to hold on to a job providing you with taxable income (or if you are self-employed, generating pre-tax income) of up to $10,000 over the next three, and maybe six, months. The new <a href="https://www.ato.gov.au/general/gen/JobKeeper-payment/">JobKeeper</a> wage subsidy will help.</p> <p>And you need to be able to handle the “cash flow” gap - between when you start salary sacrificing income (which reduces take-home pay) and when your super fund is able to release the income to you.</p> <p>But sole traders whose business is suspended and are ceasing earning income may not be able to do so. And salary sacrifice isn’t an option if you become unemployed and move on to a government welfare payment which doesn’t allow salary sacrifice.</p> <p>The third key condition is you need to have enough assets in super to be able to withdraw $10,000 per quarter for the next six months. You can only make one application for an Australian Tax Office determination between now and June 30, and one application between July 1 and September 25.</p> <p><strong>What are we meant to make of it?</strong></p> <p>Taking it all together, a (probably unintended) consequence of the super changes has been to create a sizeable tax loophole for those who are relatively mildly impacted by the coronavirus, still earning taxable income, and have the financial capacity to salary sacrifice into super.</p> <p>While it might initially sound like a niche opportunity, it could be of interest to a significant number of the estimated six million recipients of the JobKeeper payment.</p> <p>The people who benefit will probably welcome their windfall. Some might, quite reasonably, point out that they should be expected to pay only the minimal tax legally applicable. They might even invoke the spirit of <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/kerry-packers-approach-to-tax-20160215-4akgt.html">Kerry Packer</a>.</p> <p>At a system-wide level, though, this sort of tax planning is grossly unfair and leads to a tax system that is less efficient, more complex and less sustainable.</p> <p>Income tax is easily the <a href="https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/BudgetReview201920/RevenueOverview">most important</a> source of Commonwealth government revenue. Loopholes in it feed through into company tax reveune through refundable imputation (something Labor tried to wind back in the 2019 election). There is no inheritance tax. And the main consumption tax is set at a low rate, is far from comprehensive and doesn’t fund Commonwealth government spending.</p> <p>We ought to worry about actions that erode the collection of personal income tax.</p> <p>The policy process has moved astonishingly quickly in the past three weeks. There were always going to be mistakes, and during a recession its often wise for decision makers to not let the perfect become the enemy of the good.</p> <p>But equally, we must safeguard against details that are objectively bad.</p> <p>Now we’ll see how the government responds to error.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/135306/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><em><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></em></p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/robert-breunig-167291">Robert Breunig</a>, Professor of Economics and Director, Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/crawford-school-of-public-policy-australian-national-university-3292">Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/tristram-sainsbury-297343">Tristram Sainsbury</a>, Research fellow, Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/crawford-school-of-public-policy-australian-national-university-3292">Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University</a></em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-australian-government-opens-a-coronavirus-super-loophole-its-legal-to-put-your-money-in-take-it-out-and-save-on-tax-135306">original article</a>.</em></p>

Retirement Income

Our Partners