Placeholder Content Image

Dr Charlie Teo's surprising next move after Aussie surgery restrictions

<p>One year after being slapped with restrictions that effectively stopped him from operating in Australia, Dr Charlie Teo is restarting his career overseas. </p> <p>The neurosurgeon was investigated by Australia’s Health Care Complaints Commission, who last year placed restrictions on the surgeon after they discovered he had been operating on tumours that had been deemed "inoperable". </p> <p>Now, one of China’s most respected neurosurgeons has thanked Australia for imposing such restrictions because it has allowed her country to benefit from the controversial surgeon’s ability to remove high-risk brain tumours.</p> <p>Dr Teo has been operating regularly in China including on high profile VIPs, and at least eight other countries around the world, according to reports from the <em>Sunday Telegraph</em>. </p> <p>An investigation has found Dr Teo has operated on 150 patients, with many of them being from Australia, in China, Spain, Germany, India, Switzerland, Brazil, Peru, South Africa, and Nepal since the restrictions effectively stopped him from operating in Australia.</p> <p>In an interview from Beijing, Professor Ling Feng, Deputy Director of the China International Neuroscience Institute, said she is “not worried” about the restrictions imposed on Dr Teo a year ago for unsatisfactory conduct.</p> <p>“I took a careful look into what happened over there. I don’t think it should be imputed to Charlie’s neglect of care and passion for the patients,” Professor Ling told the <em>Sunday Telegraph</em>.</p> <p>“It is just a different view of the indications for surgery. Similar cases occur across the world. Instead, I ‘thank’ Australia for the restrictions on Charlie, which gave me the opportunity to work with him.”</p> <p>In the past year, patients have travelled from Australia, Romania, Britain, Saudi Arabia, France, Indonesia, and Singapore to have Dr Teo operate.</p> <p>Of those surgeries Dr Teo’s logbook documents one death, one “poor” outcome, three “fair outcomes”, 20 “good outcomes” and 145 cases have been documented as “excellent”.</p> <p>Dr Teo says his results are better than ever and he feels terrible for patients in his own country that he can’t help, but hopes that he may one day be able to return to Australian operating rooms to help patients. </p> <p>“All it would take is one sensible and brave person in one hospital somewhere in Australia to change the status quo,” Dr Teo said.</p> <p>“Just one person to sit back and go ‘okay he might be an a**hole, he might be into money, he might be a bit of a cowboy, he might be all the things the media have said he might be, but the fact is that patients, Australian patients, some need him and he does operations that other people don’t do and most of those outcomes are good so what about we just drop the politics and allow him to operate in Australia?"</p> <p>“That’s all it would take … some common sense for the greater good, not for his sake but for the sake of patients.”</p> <p><em>Image credits: Instagram </em></p>

Caring

Placeholder Content Image

"Surely this is a prank": Council slammed for ridiculous parking restriction

<p>Melbourne City Council has been slammed online for offering free parking, but only for a measly 15 minutes. </p> <p>The new initiative, which was shared in a video to the City of Melbourne Instagram account, details how parking fees will be waived for drivers needing to run a quick errand in the CBD, as long as they return to their vehicle within 15 minutes.</p> <p>Drivers can park in a “green signed” parking space such as a ‘2P Meter’, and start a 15-minute session on the Easy-Park app to claim the offer.</p> <p>The council said they introduced the initiative for those who want to “run an errand, support a local business and take in city vibes”.</p> <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0lApxrt35h/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0lApxrt35h/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by City Of Melbourne (@cityofmelbourne)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p>The initiative, however, has been rinsed online, with many people pointing out that 15 minutes is not enough time to do anything, especially in the CBD.</p> <p>“Surely this is a prank?” one person questioned.</p> <p>“As if you can take in the vibes in 15min. And based where the carpark spots are, you’d barely make it to the shop or restaurant and back in 15,” said another.</p> <p>“15 mins? Such overwhelming generosity,” another commented. </p> <p>“How can you support any business in 15 minutes time? By sprinting to a shop and run back to the car only to find a ticket on the dashboard?,” wrote another person. </p> <p>Despite the negative feedback, City of Melbourne said more than 90,000 people had taken up the free parking offer since it was first introduced in the central city in July. </p> <p>"Drivers are embracing the flexibility of our new free 15-minute parking system, which is opening up the city by giving more drivers access to free parking outside more businesses and services,” Lord Mayor Sally Capp said in a statement in November. </p> <p>“Early data shows our parking improvements are working exactly as intended – keeping spaces turning over outside city businesses, while making it easier to find a park.”</p> <p><em>Image credits: Instagram </em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

"Self-indulgent narcissism": Tina Arena slammed for breaking lockdown restrictions

<p>Tina Arena has come under fire for bragging about breaking Covid lockdown restrictions to resist what she called a "totalitarian" regime. </p> <p>The 55-year-old singer spoke candidly with <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>The Weekend Australian</em></a>, reflecting on the 2021 Delta lockdowns and why she chose to deliberately break the restriction that prevented people from travelling within 5km of their homes. </p> <p>"Why can't you drive more than five kilometres? Guess what – watch me. So I did. I drove past my five kilometres. Am I a criminal now? You want to pull me up? Pull me up. You want to fine me? Fine me. I'm not the one with the issue here," she told the publication.</p> <p>"The issue is, there is no logic. You have no right to do that. You are fining me. This is totalitarian. We don't work like that."</p> <p>Tina went on to claim that she was the only person who was frustrated by the harsh lockdown measures enough to speak up. </p> <p>"I didn't hear anybody complaining ­during lockdown other than me: 'Why are we locked up? Where's your science? What? Why?; The fear was so much for me; it was choking me, I was like, I can't cope with all of you being so fear-driven like this, and compliant," she said.</p> <p>Tina's comments sparked outrage online, with many people weighing in on her "selfish" choice to break the rules.</p> <p>"Tina Arena is just the Pete Evans of Music," wrote one person, referring to the disgraced television chef who was criticised for his anti-vax views. </p> <p>"Tina Arena - just another ignorant, selfish, fearful individual who was unwilling to comply with lockdown orders at the height of a deadly pandemic before vaccines were available. Yes 'deadly'! I have zero sympathy for those who blatantly ignored the restrictions," said another. </p> <p>Another disgruntled reader said, "Tina Arena's self indulgent narcissism is astounding, does she think she was the only person feeling fearful, locked up and battling mental health issues during the pandemic?"</p> <p>Another person called out her actions, writing, "Very selfish of Tina Arena. Hundreds of healthcare workers were f***ing exhausted, people with disabilities and severe health conditions were (and still are) living in fear of getting sick and she decided the rules wouldn't apply to her. Very disappointing."</p> <p>Social media users were quick to point out her "selfish" comments, with one person putting things into perspective by saying, "Most of us weren't wallowing in self pity, we were just doing what we needed to do to keep our families safe."</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Man living in a tent after partner “gave up” on Covid restrictions

<p dir="ltr">A hyper-vigilant man has resorted to living in a “pressurised” tent in a garage to avoid contracting Covid, after his girlfriend relaxed about restrictions. </p> <p dir="ltr">The Aussie man named Jason, who is a self-proclaimed “Covid education activist” caused a stir online after he posted a photo of his unusual sleeping arrangements. </p> <p dir="ltr">The now-viral post shared by Jason featured a picture of the peculiar tent he claims to be sleeping in, with an air purifier sticking out of the door, igniting a firestorm of reactions on Twitter, ranging from agreeance, to humour, to concern.</p> <p dir="ltr">Despite the media storm, Jason defended his decision to maintain strict pandemic precautions, despite never having contracted Covid-19. </p> <p dir="ltr">“This is my bed in the garage because my partner has dropped precautions. I take precautions 100 per cent of the time. Don’t tell me that this hasn’t upended every f**king second of my life,” Jason declared in his original post, which included the image of his extraordinary sleeping arrangement.</p> <p dir="ltr">Taking his precautions to the next level, Jason also revealed that he has experimented with sleeping in a face mask, but he admitted that he found it uncomfortable and could not sleep properly with it. </p> <p dir="ltr">“I’ve tried to sleep in a mask, and I can’t. I know people sleep in CPAP masks all the time, so it’s possible, but I can’t do it,” he shared on Twitter.</p> <p dir="ltr">Despite the flurry of reactions to Jason’s living arrangement, he did receive some support for his precautionary measures, while some even suggested Jason leave his partner, to which he admitted the thought “had occurred to me”. </p> <p dir="ltr">Another Twitter user commended the tent and air filter idea, considering it a cost-effective and potentially effective solution to avoid contracting Covid. </p> <p dir="ltr">“I like the tent+filter idea. It’s cheap and should be effective,” another agreed.</p> <p dir="ltr">A few people shared that they empathised with Jason, and are also maintaining strict pandemic precautions. </p> <p dir="ltr">One person wrote, “Initially didn’t think much of the pic, but this is infuriating. I spend all my salary in-flo mask, enovid (antiviral nasal spray), no social life, so yes, I take precautions 100 per cent of the time.”</p> <p dir="ltr">“I’m sorry you have to live like this. I no longer see my family since they stopped masking,” another added.</p> <p dir="ltr">However, not everyone empathised with Jason’s living arrangements, saying he was being unrealistic about the future of Covid. </p> <p dir="ltr">“I work in senior living, and in the two years we’ve been open, we’ve lost zero to Covid. Even the (85-year-olds) getting it now are mild cases. Why? They’re boosted, so they don’t panic or sleep in a garage,” one commenter explained. </p> <p dir="ltr">“The vaccine is meant to enable you to live normally without worrying. Covid is endemic, so you will be in the tent for the rest of your life, lol.” posted another.</p> <p dir="ltr">In response to the viral post, one Twitter user humorously remarked, “We’re a few years away from a really good documentary on how this virus broke people’s brains.”</p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 18pt;"><em>Image credits: Getty Images / Twitter</em><span id="docs-internal-guid-929ebb36-7fff-a45a-7dfd-5c273933cc32"></span></p>

Real Estate

Placeholder Content Image

Warning against latest egg-stremely restrictive diet trend

<p>A viral “egg diet” is the latest weight loss trend taking over TikTok as people continue to find ways to drop a few kilos.</p> <p>The #eggdiet has attracted over 68.5 million views, with a lot of people sharing their weight-loss success. Nutritionists warn the egg-stremely restrictive diet is simply unsustainable and just another eggs-ample of why most diets fail.</p> <p>According to TikTok users, the egg diet consists of eating only eggs for every meal, alongside low-carb snacks such as fruit, veggies, and some additional protein.</p> <p>While this diet is capable of boosting your metabolism and burning fat in the short term, it can then slow the metabolism and make it more difficult to lose weight in the future.</p> <p>One TikTok user trying the diet admitted she had broken it, writing, ”I think the last nine days of eating the bare minimum has caught up with me today. The whole day I just felt nauseous.”</p> <p>A diet focused on one food eggs-cludes many healthy food groups that are otherwise beneficial for your body. This can lead to nutritional deficiencies, an unhealthy amount of weight loss, mood changes, muscle weakness, and hair loss.</p> <p>A nutrition eggs-pert from Fitness Volt says most people fail to stick with their diet long enough for it to work sustainably. They make fast progress, but egg-ventually, they fall off the wagon and return to their previous diet plan.</p> <p>"That's why so many of us lose weight only to regain it shortly afterwards, and it seems long-term, sustainable weight loss is rare nowadays," Saini said.</p> <p>"Fortunately, healthy eating doesn't have to be complicated or unpleasant, and weight management doesn't have to take over your life.</p> <p>"You don't even have to give up your favourite foods. However, you will need to quit looking for short-term fixes and adopt healthier long-term habits.”</p> <p>It is clear the #eggdiet is not sustainable and the lack of nutrition is likely to leave your brain scrambled.</p> <p>The idea is a bit of a crack-up, but don’t <em>whisk</em> it.</p> <p><em>Image credit: TikTok</em></p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

"Let him do this job": Mother of Charlie Teo's "miracle girl" blasts surgery restrictions

<p>The mother of Dr Charlie Teo's "miracle girl" has spoken out against the restrictions placed on the surgeon and how they will impact the lives of many families with sick kids. </p> <p>In 2019, Milli became one of Dr Teo's most well-known patients after he successfully removed 98 per cent of a brain tumour that had been dubbed inoperable and incurable by other surgeons. </p> <p>Although Milli tragically died in January 2021, her mother Monica said she feels “devastated” and “disappointed” over the restrictions placed on Dr Teo, saying it will greatly impact patients and their families who no longer have access to potentially lifesaving surgery.</p> <p>Since August 2021, Dr Teo has been barred from operating in Australia under rules imposed by the Medical Council of NSW. </p> <p>In order to operate, Dr Teo must have written approval from a second independent neurosurgeon with more than 20 years of specialist experience. </p> <p>These conditions will remain in place until September 30, when they will be subject to review.</p> <p>“Why? Just why? I wish they’d leave him alone and let him do this job. He helps people – that’s all he does,” Monica told <a href="https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/mum-of-dr-charlie-teos-miracle-girl-amelia-milli-lucas-says-operating-restrictions-have-robbed-australians/news-story/9fb19e4d6ab9b644e30ff03817d813b1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">news.com.au</a>. </p> <p>“I know the neurosurgeons in Australia think he’s a cowboy and think he takes things just that little bit extra … but that should be left to the patient to choose.”</p> <p>Dr Teo has has had daily requests from desperate patients to operate, as Monica said it should be up the patients to have final say over their treatment, and it’s an opportunity she’s grateful that her daughter had. </p> <p>“A neurosurgeon could go: ‘No, I’m not going to do it because in three months time it’s going to be back in and you’re going to be dead anyway’ but if someone wants to do it and live that three months, why aren’t they given that choice? Charlie gives you that choice,” she added.</p> <p>“He doesn’t mince his words and he doesn’t give anyone false hope, he just gives them real hope.”</p> <p>She also said the rules which have limited Dr Teo’s operating ability also “robbed” the “medical industry” and future research as well.</p> <p>Since the neurosurgeon has been barred from operating in Australia, Dr Teo has continued teaching, lecturing and performing pro bono surgery internationally.</p> <p>“I feel sorry for the people in Australia who want to be a neurosurgeon and aren’t able to learn from the best in the world.”</p> <p><em>Image credits: Facebook</em></p>

Caring

Placeholder Content Image

Tenant “living in hell” with nightmare landlord’s restrictions

<p dir="ltr">A woman claims she was “living in hell” under the regime of a strict landlord just days into her tenancy. </p> <p dir="ltr">The woman, named Mel, says her landlady imposed several unreasonable restrictions two days after she moved in, which involved restricting her access to parts of the house to short windows. </p> <p dir="ltr">Mel paid $1,090 (£595) a month to live in the two-storey South London home, and said that everything started out great in her new home when she moved in.</p> <p dir="ltr">Speaking with <a href="https://www.mylondon.news/news/south-london-news/south-london-woman-living-hell-23205354">MyLondon</a>, Mel said her landlady Sheena Shepherd presented her with a set of rules for the home within the first week of her tenancy, stipulating that she would only have access to the kitchen between 9am to 11am and 12pm to 2pm as Shepherd would be running PT sessions from home. </p> <p dir="ltr">If she needed to use the kitchen outside of these hours, she needed to cross reference Shepherd's demanding schedule.</p> <p dir="ltr">The lounge room was also off limits, with access only allowed to reach the kitchen. </p> <p dir="ltr">Mel also wouldn't be able to use the front door to the property between 9am and 5:30pm and was only permitted to work from home in her bedroom.</p> <p dir="ltr">Mel also told MyLondon that she was to "only come down the stairs once a day" in order to avoid disturbing Shepherd while she worked in the lounge, and was banned from having deliveries sent to the house as the doorbell was deemed "too distracting".</p> <p dir="ltr">Elsewhere in the house, Mel claims wardrobes were full of her landlady's "personal stuff," leaving her to keep her own belongings in the loft or shed.</p> <p dir="ltr">The relationship between the two quickly deteriorated, as Shepherd told Mel over WhatsApp, "You pay for a ROOM. If you want full access to the half, pay half the bills too. When you can pay £1,000 you can have equal say! Have some respect and not be so bloody entitled."</p> <p dir="ltr">Despite only having a three-month rental contract, Shepherd continuously tried to get Mel to leave early, but to no avail. </p> <p dir="ltr">The conflict eventually culminated in Shepherd having a party in the residence, where one of her guests verbally abused Mel in the kitchen with the police being called as a result. </p> <p dir="ltr">Tired of the abuse and restrictions at the hands of her landlady, Mel left the home and moved into a hotel, which she asked Shepherd to cover the costs of. </p> <p dir="ltr">The pair are now involved in legal proceedings over what happened during Mel’s tenancy. </p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image credits: Getty Images / MyLondon</em></p>

Real Estate

Placeholder Content Image

Why smoking shouldn’t give movies an automatic R rating

<p>In an era when <a href="http://www.whitehutchinson.com/blog/2014/01/movie-attendance-continued-its-long-term-decline-in-2013/">cinema attendance</a> is in continual decline, the United States Surgeon General’s <a href="http://http//www.cdc.gov//tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/youth_data/movies/index.htm">proposal</a> that all movies depicting smoking should be rated R is a particular form of silliness. </p><p>The Surgeon General <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/50th-anniversary/">estimates</a> that giving an R rating to movies with smoking would reduce the number of young smokers in the US by nearly 18% and prevent one million deaths from smoking among children alive today. </p><p>But these statements are based on <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001078">questionable assumptions</a> and calculations.</p><h2>Beyond the cinema</h2><p>Advocates for R ratings argue two effects. R-rating would dramatically reduce the number of young people who would be exposed to smoking scenes in movies. And it would act as a major disincentive to movie producers to include smoking scenes because R rated movies attract smaller audiences. These producers would thus self-censor smoking scenes after doing the box office maths.</p><p>But studies purporting to demonstrate the power of smoking scenes to cause smoking already include R-rating movies in their smoking scene exposure assessments. In this 2007 <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/119/5/e1167.long">paper</a>, for example, 40% of the films were R-rated. The same research team has also <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/114/1/149.long">shown</a> that 81% of US adolescents are allowed to watch R-rated movies. </p><p>If youth who allegedly start smoking because of exposure to smoking in movies are already watching lots of R-rated movies, how would an R-rating reduce such exposure? </p><p>Moving movies with smoking to R-rating would put the onus on parents to regulate their children’s viewing. Few would disagree with that. But why would parents regulate their children’s viewing more because of concern about smoking than they do now because of concerns about exposure to strong violence and explicit sex in R-rated movies?</p><p>If the R-rating solution is designed to prevent youth seeing smoking, it may prevent them seeing it in cinemas, but it will not prevent them seeing the newly rated R movies elsewhere with consummate ease, increasingly so as download and i-View markets rapidly expand. It surely cannot be long until proponents of R-rating realise they will need to call for total movie censorship of smoking. If they’re comfortable with that, let them be open about it.</p><p>But I, for one, am not. And because the call for this proposal has received no serious consideration outside of the US and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_India">India</a> (a nation with a strong history of censorship), I’m certainly not alone. </p><h2>Art imitating life</h2><p>As I wrote <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001078">before</a> in the journal PLOS Medicine, I’m concerned that public health advocates think it’s reasonable for the state to regulate cultural products such as movies, books, art and theatre to further their cause.</p><p>Film isn’t just about the communication of public health messages to the masses. And children’s moral development and health decision-making is far complex than a response to wholesome role models. </p><p>Filmmakers depict all sorts of antisocial, unhealthy and even dangerous realities that we might expect in society. That doesn’t mean the behaviour is desirable or that the filmmaker is endorsing the behaviour. </p><p>In nations such as Australia which ban all forms of tobacco advertising, any evidence of paid tobacco product placement in movie would be a breach of the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/tapa1992314/">Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act 1992</a>. There would be many inside the local film industry who would be appalled if tobacco companies were paying illegally for such scenes to occur. </p><p>There have been no whistleblowers exposing this here, so any smoking scenes are highly likely to be script and directional judgements.</p><p>Smoking prevalence in <a href="http://www.tobaccoinaustralia.org.au/chapter-1-prevalence/1-6-prevalence-of-smoking-secondary-students">Australian children</a> is at an all-time low, as it is in the <a href="http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/press_releases/post/2012_12_19_survey">United States</a>. This has been achieved by the sustained combination of policies and campaigns mostly directed at adults, but to which kids are also exposed. So while smoking in movies has been rising, smoking in kids has been falling.</p><p>There are many overtly and subtly negative treatments of smoking in movies and television that are probably contributing to the decay of smoking’s former status. This compilation from the globally massively popular <em>Friends</em> TV series is illustrative.</p><p>If R-rating advocates had their way, no adolescent should ever be exposed to such programs.</p><p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p><p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-smoking-shouldnt-give-movies-an-automatic-r-rating-30864" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Conversation</a>.</em></p>

Movies

Placeholder Content Image

CDC and EU slap restrictions on travel to Australia

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As Covid-19 case numbers continue to rise due to the Omicron wave, two major international governing bodies have warned against travelling to Australia. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">America’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the European Union have both identified Australia as a “Covid danger zone”, and warned their residents against travelling Down Under. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The EU’s concerns could see Aussie travellers banned from entering Europe or forced into mandatory quarantine when arriving on European soil. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Australia joins Canada and Argentina on the EU’s “danger zone”, as European Council officials recommend restrictions not be relaxed for these countries. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The new directive means that non-essential travel to Europe from Australia could be banned by individual EU countries, although Cyprus, Greece and Italy have already gone against the ruling. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The CDC came to a similar decision about the fate of Aussie travellers, as Australia joined the likes of Israel, Argentina, Egypt, and 18 other countries on a “very high” Covid warning. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">America’s health protection agency told US residents they should avoid travelling to the “dangerous” countries that feature in the CDC’s “level four: very high risk” list. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Australia first banned international tourists at the start of the pandemic in March 2020, but has recently started to relax restrictions as the nation’s leaders are encouraging everyone to “live with the virus”.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image credits: Getty Images</span></em></p>

Domestic Travel

Placeholder Content Image

Project hosts react to Europe’s new travel restrictions for Australians

<p dir="ltr">The European Union has announced that Australia, Canada, and Argentina are no longer on their travel ‘white list’ amidst rising case numbers of COVID-19 thanks to the Omicron variant.</p> <p dir="ltr">The European Council advised member states to block visitors from Australia, which it singled out as a “Covid danger zone” due to high case numbers, which means Australian travellers will likely face restrictions for non-essential travel. The US now also considers Australia high risk, advising residents to not travel here.</p> <p dir="ltr">Not all European countries agree with the Council’s recommendations, however, with Greece, Cyprus and Italy relaxing restrictions on visiting Australians.</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>The Project<span> </span></em>hosts were less than impressed by the news, with Steve Price saying, “Fancy these (people) over there callings us dirty, filthy, Aussie Covid carriers.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Meanwhile, Peter van Onselen crunched the numbers and worked out that a number of countries labelling Australia dangerous actually had higher daily case numbers. He said, “On the numbers, it's ridiculous. Not only in overall terms for the size of the population have they had been two and three times as many cases, but even on current daily cases related to population size, European countries like France, Spain and Italy all are having more cases per day than we are.</p> <p dir="ltr">“So are they advising their citizens to don't go to Australia, and are they also saying leave Europe, leave your own country.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Chief executive of Flight Centre Graham Turner believes the move will have “minimal effect on vaccinated Australians travelling to Europe”, however. Talking to<span> </span><em>The Guardian,<span> </span></em>he said, “Each EU country has their own protocols and if you are vaccinated most do not require pre-departure testing and isolation at arrival. I believe the indications are that within three to six weeks Australians will be able to fly to North America and UK/Europe without pre-departure tests and tourists will be able to fly here under the same conditions.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Australia currently has some of the highest Covid case numbers per capita in the world, coming in just behind France. Despite this, Australia still has very low death rates, while the US has the highest.</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Network Ten</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

COVID travel restrictions have created new borders for migrants who want to visit home

<p>In the early days of the pandemic, many countries closed their borders to stop the spread of COVID-19. International travel has continued to be limited with <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-52544307">changing caveats</a>, including “essential” travel only, restrictions on travellers from particular countries and vaccination “passports”.</p> <p>While a necessary public health measure, these restrictions have been especially disruptive to migrant families. For these families, travel is a necessary part of fulfilling <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15350770.2020.1787035">familial obligations</a> and maintaining a sense of “<a href="https://www.lexico.com/definition/familyhood">familyhood</a>” and belonging across borders.</p> <p>These policies present a new layer of “everyday bordering” for transnational families. The term “<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0038038517702599">everyday bordering</a>” describes how policy and media narratives around migration affect migrants’ everyday lives and define who “belongs” in a nation state. In the UK, these borders amplify the state’s “<a href="https://www.jcwi.org.uk/the-hostile-environment-explained">hostile environment</a>”, the Home Office’s immigration policy, aimed at making it as difficult as possible to stay in the UK without adequate documentation.</p> <p>For migrants, their country of origin represents <a href="https://www.movingpeoplechangingplaces.org/locations/home-and-away.html">home</a> and family. Visiting home is important to many people’s wellbeing and allows migrants to be part of <a href="https://www.expatica.com/living/family/family-rituals-442783/">family traditions</a> and religious and <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-09/how-china-s-big-annual-migration-differs-this-year-quicktake">cultural festivals</a>. Travel may also be necessary to fulfil caring obligations for ageing, sick or young relatives.</p> <p>Pandemic aside, the ability to visit home and family has always been constrained by a number of factors, including migration status and travel costs. The impact of these everyday borders on some migrants’ lives has been <a href="https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Addressing-the-pain-of-separation-for-refugee-families.pdf">well-documented</a>.</p> <p>The introduction of COVID-19 travel restrictions has inhibited and added costly and complex border checks into the everyday lives of migrants. This is at a time when the need to maintain transnational family caring practices is particularly important.</p> <h2>Everyday borders</h2> <p>Our fieldwork for the study <a href="https://everydaybordering-familiesandsocialcare.group.shef.ac.uk/">“Everyday Bordering in the UK”</a> aims to understand how immigration legislation – including COVID-19 travel restrictions – has impacted social care practitioners and the migrant families they support.</p> <p>Through interviews, diary entries and ethnographic observations, we explored how families from diverse migratory backgrounds experience everyday bordering. While transnational family practices were not our primary focus, our work has revealed the impact of COVID-19 travel restrictions on transnational family life. This was also supported by our researcher’s own travel experiences when visiting family in Italy.</p> <p>Our research participants consistently discussed and wrote about their family members who do not live in the UK and expressed feeling responsible for their care. This demonstrates how important it is for family members to be able to travel in order to provide care.</p> <p>Some expressed remorse at being unable to travel historically, due to restrictive visa conditions or prohibitive flight costs. Interviews and ethnographic observations from online English language classes also reveal the impact of COVID-19 travel restrictions on fulfilling care practices.</p> <p>One couple from Poland –- whom we call Krystyna and Henryk –- now living in the UK, describe the disruption caused by such restrictions. In March 2020, Krystyna was visiting Poland to help her parents with her ageing grandparents, when travel was first inhibited. She was unable to return to her partner in the UK due to flight cancellations.</p> <p>During this time, Henryk described being “depressed” and alone, saying, "My family isn’t here because they are in Poland, so I spent a few days in bed […] it was a very bad experience in my life."</p> <p>While commercial flights were not available at that time, <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-52098067">chartered flights</a> returned many citizens back to their home countries from work or holiday. But these flights did not take into account those in Krystyna’s position – as a Polish citizen – and their transnational caring responsibilities, which are now divided between two countries.</p> <h2>Essential travel</h2> <p>Now that many countries have reopened their borders for travel, governments and airlines have implemented a series of measures and checks to contain the virus. Examples include <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/safe-covid-19-vaccines-europeans/eu-digital-covid-certificate_en">the EU green pass</a>, <a href="https://www.gov.uk/provide-journey-contact-details-before-travel-uk">the UK’s passenger locator form</a>, evidence of testing negative for COVID-19 and compulsory quarantine in hotels.</p> <p>These can be costly and hard to access, as our researcher noted in her own experience, "After not seeing my family for over one year, including my mum with a severe disability, we decided to fly to Italy. For the trip, we needed four tests, costing … £160 per person. Italy required a 48-hour test, and not a postal test. For a person living in London there were more, cheaper options but not for people in rural areas. In Italy, we also had to isolate for five days and get a further green pass to access public spaces."</p> <p>For two participants in the English language class, despite wanting to visit their mothers in Turkey and India, these measures were so costly and “complicated” that they said they “didn’t bother to ask for permission”. They realised it would be too difficult to travel, and they cancelled their plans to visit their families.</p> <p>The global emergency of COVID-19 has presented many challenges for governments, and has emphasised the differing needs of populations, including those who are marginalised.</p> <p>Since the initial peak of the crisis in early 2020, many countries, the UK included, permitted carers to move between different households to provide care. While international travel restrictions are an important feature of public health responses, in the context of this health crises, migrant families’ need to travel should also be recognised.</p> <p>Health-related boarding requirements should, we believe, be removed in a timely manner, but governments can do more to support migrant families in the short term. If we consider differing regulations between countries, the current system is too complex, costly and contradictory. There is a need for international agreements to standardise the documentation required to travel and make processes more streamlined and accessible.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p> <p><em>This image originally appeared in <a rel="noopener" href="https://theconversation.com/covid-travel-restrictions-have-created-new-borders-for-migrants-who-want-to-visit-home-171461" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.</em></p>

Travel Tips

Placeholder Content Image

How over 60s are coping better with lockdown restrictions

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">With over half the Australian population currently subject to stay-at-home orders, there is mounting evidence that older people are handling COVID-19 lockdowns better than their younger counterparts. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A recent study conducted by Macquarie University psychologists found that Aussie pensioners are experiencing better mental health and general wellbeing through the pandemic. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The research </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">has measured the mental, social and physical wellbeing impacts of COVID-19 on older adults across a range of samples.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Overall, we are finding that while many older adults reported low mood and worry, it is not as severe as might be expected, and that in many cases older adults were coping well,” says Professor Viviana Wuthrich, Director of Macquarie University’s Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Professor Wuthrich says these findings are consistent with global research and further reinforces the conclusion that age is associated with greater psychological resilience in the face of crisis.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">While this study found that older people were more mentally resilient during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study took place in a US city in March 2020 before the effects of the deadly and highly contagious Delta variant were felt around the world. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Even though older people understood they were at greater risk if they got COVID, that they could die or have serious complications – they still reported better mental health and better wellbeing,” she says.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We've seen the same effects from studies in Spain, Canada and the Netherlands, and all found that older people were doing better than younger people.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Professor Wuthrich did note that many studies found there was a significant increase in loneliness among the older generations, while technology was considered a ‘protective factor’ in combating feelings of isolation. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We found that living with someone else, rather than living alone, was protective,” she says.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We also found that another strong predictor of whether older people were resilient was about how much contact they had with their grandchildren.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Those older people who were maintaining contact with grandchildren, whether via telephone or video conferencing, or in some cases, still face-to-face, were experiencing better mental health,” she says.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image credit: Shutterstock</span></em></p>

Retirement Life

Placeholder Content Image

Harsh new restrictions for NSW

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian has announced a four-week extension of Greater Sydney’s COVID-19 lockdown as the latest outbreak continues to grow.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The lockdown will be extended for the Greater Sydney area, including the Central Coast, Wollongong, Shellharbour, and the Blue Mountains, until August 28.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The news comes as the state recorded 177 new cases of COVID-19 to 8pm last night, with 46 individuals in the community during their infectious period.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shopping rules have been tightened further, meaning no one can go shopping more than 10 kilometres away from their local government area (LGA).</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Additionally, three more LGAs will be placed under stricter lockdown restrictions. Workers in the Parramatta, Georges River, and Campbelltown LGAs cannot leave the area for work unless they are an aged care or critical worker. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This comes as an expansion to the areas in lockdown, which already include Cumberland, Canterbury-Bankstown, Blacktown, Liverpool, and Fairfield.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Construction rules have been loosened, allowing construction works to occur in non-occupied dwellings outside the eight LGAs in lockdown from Saturday, July 31. A maximum of two workers will be allowed inside a dwelling, while a maximum of five will be allowed to work outside.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Outside of the lockdown areas, tradies will also be allowed to visit homes if they won’t come into contact with anyone while they are working.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Premier has also announced the use of rapid antigen testing for year 12 students so that they can recommence face-to-face learning on Monday, August 16.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Year 12 students within the eight affected LGAs are also expected to be vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These doses will be coming from the regions, not from other states or the Commonwealths.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Teachers are encouraged to take the AstraZeneca vaccine.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There are no plans for face-to-face learning to resume for students in other grades over the next four weeks.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The state will also introduce a ‘singles bubble’, similar to the one used during Melbourne’s 2020 lockdown, which allows people living by themselves to nominate one person from outside their home that can come and visit. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The nominated person must be the same person for the next four weeks.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For those within the eight affected LGAs, the chosen person must be within the 10km radius and within the same LGA.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The death of a woman in her 90s from COVID-19 has been announced, following her passing yesterday at Liverpool Hospital.</span></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

NSW announces new restrictions as cases surge

<p>NSW has recorded another huge surge of COVID-19 cases, with 16 new infections recorded overnight.</p> <p>NSW Health announced 10 new locally acquired cases in the 24 hours to 8pm last night, seven of which were announced yesterday.</p> <p>There were also 13 new locally acquired cases confirmed after the official reporting period, meaning they will be included in tomorrow's numbers.</p> <p>There are now 37 cases linked to the Bondi cluster.</p> <p>A number of new restrictions have also been announced.</p> <p>From 4pm today the following restrictions will apply for Greater Sydney, Blue Mountains, Central Coast and Shellharbour:</p> <p>• No more than five visitors to any household, including children</p> <p>• All customers must be seated at hospitality venues</p> <p>• Masks will be compulsory in all indoor non-residential settings, including workplaces, and at organised outdoor events</p> <p>• No singing or dancing at venues, except weddings which can have 20 people on the dance floor at one time</p> <p>• The one person per four square metre rule will be reinstated</p> <p>• Outdoor seated events will be limited to 50% seated capacity</p> <p>• Dance and gym classes will be capped at 20, with masks required</p> <p>Anyone who lives or works in the City of Sydney, Waverley, Randwick, Canada Bay, Inner West, Bayside, and Woollahra LGAs cannot travel outside metropolitan Sydney for non-essential travel.</p> <p>Ms Berejiklian held off on announcing a lockdown, but urged all residents to “abandon non-essential activities” and not attend social gatherings unless absolutely necessary.</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Patient zero of Sydney's latest outbreak revealed as restrictions are extended

<p>The Sydney COVID-19 patient dubbed "BBQ man" after he visited multiple BBQ stores around the city while infectious has been named, finally providing an explanation for his shopping spree.</p> <p>Investment company Apollo Global Management managing director Tom Pizzey has been identified by the Australian Financial Review as the man linked to Sydney's latest COVID-19 scare.</p> <p>Mr Pizzey is understood to have the "double mutant" Indian strain of the virus, with his wife also testing positive to COVID-19.</p> <p>AFR reported Mr Pizzey is still dealing with symptoms of the virus, with Apollo confirming it is assisting NSW Health in relation to a positive virus case.</p> <p>“The employee has not travelled outside Australia this year,” an Apollo spokesperson told<span> </span><em>AFR</em>.</p> <p>Mr Pizzey, who is one of Apollo's only two full-time employees in Australia, is understood to be the mystery COVID-19 case who visited multiple venues on May 1 while unknowingly infectious, including multiple BBQ stores.</p> <p>He visited two different Barbecue Galore stores as the chain is in its early stages of auction.</p> <p>Mr Pizzey was checking out the stores for Apollo, with reports the company is considering acquiring the chain.</p> <p>In the same day, Mr Pizzey also visited Joe’s Barbeques &amp; Heating in Silverwater, Tucker Barbecues in Silverwater and The Meat Store in Bondi Junction</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Vic restrictions back after highly infectious new COVID case

<p>Kmart, Coles and Bunnings outlets are among exposure sites flagged as "tier-1" after a hotel quarantine worker in Melbourne tested positive for COVID-19 as confirmed by Victoria's health department.</p> <p>Premier Daniel Andrews said the infected worker was a 26-year-old man from Melbourne's Noble Park and was working for the Australian Open quarantine program.</p> <p>In an urgent press conference last night, Andrews said: “We have to assume that this person has infected others” and urged residents to check the exposure sites to see if they've visited any of them.</p> <p>He also stressed the need for residents to get tested if they're showing symptoms "first thing tomorrow morning". He said more sites may be added to the list and at 1:30 am new exposure sites were added.</p> <p>He said the infected man had been “very cooperative” with health officials and had “given us great levels of detail”.</p> <p>“If people are sick and don’t get tested and go about their business, it’s a problem for all of us,” he said.</p> <p>“To go about your business when you’re sick, that puts everything at risk, for you, your family, for someone you’ll never meet.</p> <p>“Come and get tested if you’ve been at one of these sites, I can’t be any clearer than that, it is the most important thing to really take control of this.”</p> <p>According to Victoria's public health, the man last worked at the Grant Hyatt on 29 January and was tested at the end of their shift, returning a negative result.</p> <p>He began developing symptoms and was tested again on February 2.</p> <p>He returned a positive result on Wednesday.</p> <p>Health officials are in touch with Australian Open players, officials and support staff who were staying at the Grand Hyatt during the entire period.</p> <p>They are considered casual contacts and must immediately isolate and get tested.</p> <p>Hotel staff who were working at the same time as the individual are considered primary close contacts and will also be contacted. They must isolate for 14 days and get tested.</p> <p><strong>EXPOSURE SITES</strong></p> <p>Anyone who has visited these Tier 1 exposure sites during these times must immediately isolate, get a coronavirus (COVID-19) test, and remain isolated for 14 days.</p> <p><strong>FRIDAY JANUARY 29, 2021</strong></p> <p><strong>Exford Hotel: Melbourne</strong></p> <p>11:00 pm - 11:35pm</p> <p><strong>Kebab Kingz: West Melbourne</strong></p> <p>11:24 pm - 12:15am</p> <p><strong>SATURDAY JANUARY 30, 2021</strong></p> <p><strong>Club Noble in Noble Park</strong></p> <p>46-56 Moodemere St</p> <p>Noble Park VIC 3174</p> <p>14:36 – 15:30</p> <p><strong>Aces Sporting Club (Driving Range)</strong></p> <p>Cnr Springvale Rd and Hutton Rd, Keysborough, VIC 3173</p> <p>22:00 – 23:15</p> <p><strong>SUNDAY JANUARY 31, 2021</strong></p> <p><strong>Northpoint cafe Brighton</strong></p> <p>2b North Road, Brighton VIC 3186</p> <p>08:10 – 09:30</p> <p><strong>Kmart Keysborough</strong></p> <p>Parkmore Keysborough Shopping Centre, C/317 Cheltenham Rd, Keysborough VIC 3173</p> <p>16:00 – 17:00</p> <p><strong>Kmart Brandon Park</strong></p> <p>Brandon Park Shopping Centre, Cnr Springvale &amp; Ferntree Gully Rds, Brandon Park, VIC 3170</p> <p>16:35 – 17:10</p> <p><strong>Coles Springvale</strong></p> <p>825 Dandenong Rd, Springvale VIC 3171</p> <p>17:00 – 18:00</p> <p><strong>MONDAY FEBRUARY 1, 2021</strong></p> <p><strong>Lululemon DFO</strong></p> <p>Moorabbin</p> <p>5:00 pm - 5:45pm</p> <p><strong>Woolworths</strong></p> <p>Springvale</p> <p>6.30 pm – 7.30pm</p> <p><strong>Nakama Workshop</strong></p> <p>Clayton South</p> <p>11.15 am – 12.00pm</p> <p><strong>Sharetea</strong></p> <p>Springvale</p> <p>6.50 pm – 7.30pm</p> <p><strong>Bunnings Springvale</strong></p> <p>849 Princes Hwy, Springvale VIC 3171</p> <p>11:28 – 12:15</p> <p><strong>Melbourne Golf Academy</strong></p> <p>385 Centre Dandenong Rd, Heatherton VIC 3202</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Finally an end to "most ridiculous" COVID restriction

<p>Greater Brisbane is now officially out of lockdown, but masks will still be a part of day to day life for the next ten days.</p> <p>Residents have been told they will need to wear a mask "wherever possible", but will no longer need to wear one in their own car - a rule slammed as "absolutely ridiculous" during the city's three-day weekend lockdown.</p> <p>On Monday, Queensland recorded no new locally acquired cases, which prompted the Premier to ease restrictions from 6pm.</p> <p>Queensland Health initially told drivers and passengers to wear a mask in the car “because a consistent approach helps keep people safe.”</p> <p>“We want you to wear a mask when you leave home – by whatever means, for whatever reason,” a social media post read on Saturday.</p> <p>However, as the end of lockdown was announced, the Premier and Chief Health Officer also clarified that masks were no longer required while driving.</p> <p>It’s a rule that was immediately slammed as “ridiculous” by Brisbane residents, prompting an outpouring of backlash on social media.</p> <p>After it was first announced, many criticised Queensland Health for having “officially lost the plot”.</p> <p>“This is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen … QLD health are off their rockers and out of control,” Al Lancaster said.</p> <p>“The car contains covid particles that only happened since going into a three-day lockdown, so that’s why we have to wear a mask in the car … also wear one at home and in the shower … also on the toilet,” Hayley Mah wrote.</p> <p>“There is no scientific valid reason to wear a mask in your own car when by yourself,” Yvette Harth said.</p> <p>“Wearing a mask alone in your car is just like wearing a condom alone in your bed,” another user wrote.</p> <p>“Hey QLD Health. Just wondering if I need to wear a mask in my coffin when I die. Thanks!” wrote Liam Haverty.</p> <p>“Queensland Health have no idea on the information they are providing,” Supa Tony wrote.</p> <p>Annastacia Palaszczuk thanked Queenslanders for their "remarkable effort" over the three day period, but went on to say until at least January 22, those in Brisbane will be required to wear masks.</p> <p>“We want to make sure that the incubation period, that 14 days, has totally lapsed before we return to normal,” Ms Palaszczuk said.</p> <p>Residents of Brisbane, Ipswich, Logan, Moreton Bay and Redlands council areas will need to carry a face mask with them “at all times” until 1 am on January 22.</p> <p>“You will need to wear your mask in shopping centres, supermarkets, retail outlets and indoor markets,” Ms Palaszczuk said.</p> <p>“In hospitals and aged care facilities, in churches and places of worship, libraries and at indoor recreational facilities such as cinemas, art galleries and gyms.”</p> <p>Masks are also mandatory in indoor workplaces where workers are unable to socially distance, as well as on public transport, and in taxis and ride shares.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Queensland to open border to NSW as premier announces easing of restrictions

<p>Queenslanders will be able to stand while they and drink from Friday afternoon as a road map for further easing of restrictions is announced which reveals the border to NSW will likely open on November 1.</p> <p>Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk released road map which breaks down the further easing of restrictions into three parts.</p> <p>“We have always said that we would continue to ease restrictions where we could in a staged and balanced way to keep Queenslanders safe – and this plan does just that,” she said.</p> <p>“We’ve had to make hard decisions, but it is because of these and the hard work of Queenslanders that we are in the position to continue easing restrictions.”</p> <p>Under the road map, stage 4 began at 1 am on October 1, 2020, which added extra local government areas included in the declared border zone across northern NSW.</p> <p>Those at indoor and outdoor venues with a COVID Safe plan will be permitted to stand while eating and drinking from 4 pm on October 2, and outdoor density increases to one person per 2sqm.</p> <p>Outdoor events have also doubled capacity from 500 to 1000 people.</p> <p>Stage 5 would be put in place at 1 am on November 1, which would see the borders open to New South Wales, with visitors and returned travellers to having to complete mandatory quarantine.</p> <p>But the border will only open if there was no community transmission in NSW for 28 days.</p> <p>“We have made it very clear that our borders have kept us safe … We’re watching NSW very closely,” Ms Palaszczuk said.</p> <p>Under stage 5, gatherings of up to 40 people will be permitted in homes and public spaces across the state, and 40 people can dance at weddings. </p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Victoria now has a good roadmap out of COVID-19 restrictions

<p>The COVID-19 <a href="https://www.vic.gov.au/coronavirus-covid-19-restrictions-roadmaps">roadmap for Victoria</a> announced by Premier Daniel Andrews sets the state on the right path. Something like it should be emulated by New South Wales, which has not yet achieved zero new cases.</p> <p>Victoria’s roadmap towards what Andrews calls “COVID-normal” makes a <a href="https://theconversation.com/victorias-path-out-of-covid-19-lockdown-quick-reference-guides-145674">clear distinction between metropolitan Melbourne and regional Victoria</a>. Restrictions are marginally less severe in regional Victoria, where the incidence of infections is lower.</p> <p>For metropolitan Melbourne there are five steps; regional Victoria has four. For each step, the roadmap outlines which restrictions will be lifted on our road towards the cherished status of COVID-normal – or zero active cases of COVID-19. The roadmap also provisionally outlines when restrictions will be lifted, although this depends on case numbers.</p> <p><strong>Get your news from people who know what they’re talking about.</strong></p> <p>Hear from them</p> <p>For metropolitan Melbourne, the curfew will be eased from next week to start at 9pm instead of 8pm. It will remain in place until new cases average fewer than five per day over the course of a fortnight – the criterion to move to the third step of the roadmap.</p> <p>The first two steps will still entail significant restrictions on public gatherings and visitors, plus the creation of a “single social bubble” allowance, under which people living alone can designate a person who can visit their home. Staged school returns will begin once there are fewer than 50 cases a day on a fortnightly average.</p> <p>Step three sees the partial resumption of Melbourne’s café culture, as well as hairdressing.</p> <p>A new <a href="https://theconversation.com/could-traffic-light-alerts-help-victoria-exit-lockdown-safely-144931">traffic light system</a> will also be introduced to allow a <a href="https://www.vic.gov.au/industry-restrictions-roadmap-metro-melbourne">phased reopening for businesses and workplaces</a>.</p> <p><strong>Is the roadmap heading in the right direction?</strong></p> <p>Grattan Institute’s four-point plan, detailed in our report last week titled <a href="https://grattan.edu.au/report/how-australia-can-get-to-zero-covid-19-cases/">Go for zero</a>, argues that states should reaffirm the <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/national-cabinet-24jul20">National Cabinet’s target of zero transmissions</a> and set clear criteria for easing restrictions.</p> <p>The Victorian roadmap keeps appropriate restrictions until zero active cases – the Grattan criterion for defining zero – before the final step on the roadmap, COVID-normal.</p> <p>Grattan’s second criterion – clear and explicit staging of the easing of restrictions – is also met in the Victorian roadmap, but in a confusing way. The thresholds adopted in the Victorian plan are a mishmash of epidemiological criteria, case numbers and dates.</p> <p>It is entirely appropriate that the roadmap’s dates are purely provisional, and subject to epidemiological criteria such as average case numbers. But this raises the question of why the roadmap has dates at all.</p> <p>Victorians may read the epidemiological criteria as reasons to bring forward the provisional dates for easing restrictions, when in reality they are more likely to put the provisional dates back. The public might end up frustrated if the promised date passes with no reward for good behaviour.</p> <p>The epidemiological criteria are expressed in an extremely complex way: a 14-day threshold average, plus further criteria based on the source of infection. Until now, the public’s attention has been focused simply on the number of new cases each day.</p> <p>Introducing this more complex measure is a step backward. Expressing the criterion as an average also runs the risk of the threshold being met but the final few days of the 14-day averaging period revealing an upward trend. A simple and clear criterion, based on number of new cases, would have been better.</p> <p><strong>Politics as well as science?</strong></p> <p>The Victorian government has trumpeted the use of <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-06/victoria-coronavirus-covid-19-lockdown-restrictions-modelling/12633906">epidemiological modelling to support its decisions</a>. However the first two steps seem to be driven by a mix of politics and science.</p> <p>Step one will occur on September 13, regardless of the number of new cases detected between now and then. The new case threshold for step two is expressed as an average of 30-50 cases a day over the previous 14 days. It is unclear why there is a lower bound; why not just say “fewer than 50 cases”? If it is designed to give political flexibility, it defeats the purpose of clear criteria.</p> <p>Knowledge of the coronavirus and how it works – both in terms of clinical treatment and public health science – is advancing rapidly. We now know more about <a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3223">which restrictions work best</a> than we did when Melbourne first entered its Stage 4 lockdown.</p> <p>Some restrictions included in the roadmap – such as night curfews – now have a weak evidence base. The evidence is also stronger now in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31483-5/fulltext">allowing primary schools to return</a> before secondary schools, but the roadmap takes no account of this distinction. It is a pity the roadmap doesn’t align more closely with the latest science.</p> <p>Lockdowns are necessary, but they have big downsides which need to be weighed against the undoubted benefits. One main downside is that they <a href="https://grattan.edu.au/news/waves-of-inequity-in-the-coronavirus-pandemic/">hit the most disadvantaged people hardest</a>. The cost of social isolation has been somewhat ameliorated in the roadmap, with its provision for “social bubbles”, but this could perhaps have been more generous.</p> <p>Overall, Victoria’s roadmap is good. It identifies the right goal (zero active cases), it provides explicit criteria for when restrictions might be lifted (but unfortunately not as clear and simple as they could be), and each of the steps involves mostly appropriate restrictions.</p> <p>Victorians have every reason to share in Andrews’ hopefulness for a COVID-normal Christmas to cap off a very difficult year.</p> <p><em>Written by Stephen Duckett. Republished with permission of <a href="https://theconversation.com/victoria-now-has-a-good-roadmap-out-of-covid-19-restrictions-new-south-wales-should-emulate-it-145393">The Conversation.</a></em></p>

Travel Tips

Our Partners